Crain v. United States
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Garland v. Washington overruled Crain's formal arraignment and recorded plea requirement when the defendant had notice and an opportunity to defend and went to trial without a timely objection. Crain’s separate indictment holdings remain distinct.
60 later cases cite Crain v. United States; 60 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Crain v. United States?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Court overruled Crain to the extent it required technical enforcement of formal arraignment and plea rights in criminal procedure.
Garland v. Washington · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
we now are constrained to hold that the technical enforcement of formal ... rights in criminal procedure sustained in the Crain Case is no longer required in the prosecution of offenses under present systems of law, and so far as that case is not in accord with the views herein expressed it is necessarily overruled.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Crain v. United States and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace