Paul v. Virginia
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
All 38 flagged citations have been read.
38 later cases cite Paul v. Virginia; 38 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Paul v. Virginia?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in Part
-
The Supreme Court rejected Paul's rule that issuing insurance policies is outside interstate commerce and held that Congress may regulate insurance business conducted across state lines.
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn. · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
In 1869 this Court held, in sustaining a statute of Virginia which regulated foreign insurance companies, that the statute did not offend the Commerce Clause because 'issuing a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce.' Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, 183, 19 L.Ed. 357. ... No commercial enterprise of any kind which conducts its activities across state lines has been held to be wholly beyond the regulatory power of Congress under the Commerce Clause. We cannot make an exception of the business of insurance.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Paul v. Virginia and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace