Case Citator › Y.C. v. Holder

Y.C. v. Holder

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Second Circuit
Citation
741 F.3d 324
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
87 of 87
Citing cases (total)
570
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Y.C. v. Holder is good law: all 87 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. The citing opinions applied Y.C. positively when reviewing the agency's evaluation of documentary evidence, particularly letters from interested witnesses unavailable for cross-examination.
More on how this was screened

Nearby adverse language instead reported Hui Lin Huang v. Holder's treatment of Matter of H-L-H- & Z-Y-Z-, Shi Liang Lin v. Department of Justice's treatment of Jin Shui Qiu v. Ashcroft, or treatment of other immigration authorities. One January 2020 summary order was superseded by an amended order, but neither version adversely treated Y.C.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

570 later cases cite Y.C. v. Holder; 87 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Y.C. v. Holder?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 87 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Y.C. v. Holder and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace