Case Citator › Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Abrogated
Court
Tenth Circuit
Citation
701 F.3d 620
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
36 of 36
Citing cases (total)
36
Treatment dates
2024
Abrogated
A reviewed court treats this case as abrogated by later authority. Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc. was abrogated in part by Muldrow v. City of St. Louis. The Supreme Court rejected Daniels's requirement that a discriminatory job transfer cause a significant employment disadvantage.
More on how this was screened

That treatment is listed below. All 36 flagged citations have been read; later courts continued to apply Daniels on other issues, including retaliation and filing deadlines.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

36 later cases cite Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc.; 36 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Abrogated

  • The Supreme Court rejected Daniels's significant-harm requirement for a Title VII discriminatory transfer.

    Muldrow v. City of St. Louis · Supreme Court of the United States · filed

    A shipping worker is re- quired to take a position involving only nighttime work; a court decides that the assignment does not “constitute a sig- nifcant change in employment.” Daniels v. United Parcel ... Serv., Inc., 701 F. 3d 620, 635 (CA10 2012). ... All those employees suffered some injury in employment terms or conditions (allegedly because of race or sex). Their claims were rejected solely because courts rewrote Title VII, compelling workers to make a showing that the statutory text does not require.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Daniels v. United Parcel Service, Inc. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace