Case Citator › Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Superseded by statute
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
545 U.S. 546
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
133 of 133
Citing cases (total)
2,712
Treatment dates
2009
Superseded by statute
A reviewed court treats this case as superseded by later legislation. Superseded by statute: all 133 flagged citations have been read, with the one confirmed treatment listed below. Frisby v. Keith D. Weiner & Associates Co., LPA recognized that the Class Action Fairness Act superseded Allapattah's class-action rule in some respects, while later opinions continued to apply Allapattah's broader supplemental-jurisdiction and plain-text holdings.
Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

2,712 later cases cite Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.; 133 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Superseded by statute

  • The court recognized that the Class Action Fairness Act superseded Allapattah's class-action jurisdiction rule in some respects, while continuing to rely on its broad reading of supplemental jurisdiction.

    Frisby v. Keith D. Weiner & Associates Co., LPA · N.D. Ohio · filed

    Obviously, this Court recognizes that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 in some ways superseded the rule announced in Olden and Allapattah. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). Nevertheless, the Sixth Circuit's and Supreme Court's broad reading of § 1367 is instructive.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace