Case Citator › Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman

Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Overruled in part
Court
Seventh Circuit
Citation
444 F.3d 579
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
35 of 35
Citing cases (total)
35
Treatment dates
2013
Overruled in part
A reviewed court has overruled part of this case’s holding. Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman was overruled in part by the Seventh Circuit in Hill v. Tangherlini. Hill rejected Johnson and other cases to the extent they suggested that a plaintiff may not rely on self-serving evidence to create a material factual dispute.
More on how this was screened

Johnson's rules concerning personal responsibility, deliberate indifference, and reliance on medical professionals remain unaffected. All 35 flagged citations have been read, and the confirmed adverse treatment is listed below.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

35 later cases cite Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman; 35 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Overruled in part

  • The Seventh Circuit overruled Johnson to the extent it suggested that a plaintiff may not rely on self-serving evidence to create a material factual dispute.

    Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. Tangherlini · Seventh Circuit · filed

    But today we make clear that the following cases are overruled to the extent that they suggest a plaintiff may not rely on “self-serving” evidence to create a material factual dispute. See, e.g., ... Johnson v. Snyder, 444 F.3d 579, 584 (7th Cir. 2006); ... Buie v. Quad/Graphics, Inc., 366 F.3d 496, 506 (7th Cir. 2004). Hill described the three encounters in his deposition based on his personal knowledge and set forth specific facts and the district court should have considered his statements as evidence.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace