Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Baird
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Its separate procedural due process holding remains in use. All 35 flagged citations have been read; the one confirmed treatment is listed below.
35 later cases cite Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Baird; 35 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Baird?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
Dobbs displaced the abortion right and undue burden framework Baird used to assess the Ohio clinic regulation.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
We therefore hold that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. Roe and Casey must be overruled, and the authority to regulate abortion must be returned to the peo- ple and their elected representatives.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Women's Medical Professional Corp. v. Baird and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace