Case Citator › James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby Garza Kelly Forsythe Riley Moback Sanchez Sewell Lietz Lyman Carr John Freitas Marney

James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby Garza Kelly Forsythe Riley Moback Sanchez Sewell Lietz Lyman Carr John Freitas Marney

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Eighth Circuit
Citation
437 F.3d 791
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
82 of 82
Citing cases (total)
1,117
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail remains good law: all 82 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. Later opinions applied Phillips's factors for appointing counsel or distinguished its rule about prescribed medicine on the facts.
More on how this was screened

Their nearby “abrogated” parentheticals overwhelmingly concern Edgington v. Missouri Department of Corrections, while one concerns Peterson v. Nadler; none concerns Phillips.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

1,117 later cases cite James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby Garza Kelly Forsythe Riley Moback Sanchez Sewell Lietz Lyman Carr John Freitas Marney; 82 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby Garza Kelly Forsythe Riley Moback Sanchez Sewell Lietz Lyman Carr John Freitas Marney?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 82 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby Garza Kelly Forsythe Riley Moback Sanchez Sewell Lietz Lyman Carr John Freitas Marney and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace