Neal v. Goord
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The citing opinions consistently report Porter's act while continuing to apply Neal's separate holding that exhaustion must occur before suit; none supplies an additional adverse treatment.
235 later cases cite Neal v. Goord; 115 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Neal v. Goord?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Supreme Court rejected Neal's rule that PLRA exhaustion did not reach particularized misconduct directed at one inmate, holding that exhaustion applies to every suit about prison life.
Porter v. Nussle · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
We reject both readings and hold, in line with the text and purpose of the PLRA, our precedent in point, and the weight of lower court authority, that § 1997e(a)’s exhaustion requirement applies to all prisoners seeking redress for prison circumstances or occurrences.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Neal v. Goord and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace