Case Citator › Nadine Brooks v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

Nadine Brooks v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Eleventh Circuit
Citation
116 F.3d 1364
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
88 of 88
Citing cases (total)
88
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Nadine Brooks v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. is good law in this review. All 88 flagged citations have been read; none shows a court adversely treating its holding that separately purchased individual Medigap policies were outside the Medicare Secondary Payer statute's group health plan coverage.
More on how this was screened

The Eleventh Circuit adopted only Part III.A of the attached district court order and expressly left the order's other issues undecided.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

88 later cases cite Nadine Brooks v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.; 88 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Nadine Brooks v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 88 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Nadine Brooks v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace