Case Citator › LaShawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.

LaShawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
D.C. Circuit
Citation
87 F.3d 1389
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
89 of 89
Citing cases (total)
452
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. LaShawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr. remains good law: all 89 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. Later opinions apply its law-of-the-case and law-of-the-circuit rules, while nearby overruling or abrogation language concerns other decisions.
More on how this was screened

Several citations appear only in separate opinions, including dissents. Complete opinion text recovered for Unbelievable, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Craft v. United States, and Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency resolved gaps in the initially supplied opinions. Two flagged citations belong to the same Florida Bankers Ass'n opinion; both were screened.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

452 later cases cite LaShawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.; 89 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on LaShawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 89 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads LaShawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace