Case Citator › State v. Xie

State v. Xie

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Citation
62 Ohio St. 3d 521
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
171 of 171
Citing cases (total)
1,682
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Good law — all 171 flagged citations have been read, and no adverse treatment was confirmed. The reviewed Ohio opinions applied State v. Xie's rules governing presentence motions to withdraw guilty pleas, ineffective-assistance claims following guilty pleas, and abuse-of-discretion review.
More on how this was screened

One opinion cited Xie only in a dissent that the court did not adopt. Nearby uses of “overruled” disposed of assignments of error, motions, or litigants' arguments, or concerned another authority; none treated Xie itself adversely. Opinions applying Xie's stated procedural boundaries followed the decision rather than limiting it.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

1,682 later cases cite State v. Xie; 171 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on State v. Xie?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 171 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads State v. Xie and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace