Case Citator › City of Dayton v. Rogers

City of Dayton v. Rogers

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Overruled in part
Court
Supreme Court of Ohio
Citation
60 Ohio St. 2d 162
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
44 of 44
Citing cases (total)
44
Treatment dates
1996
Overruled in part
A reviewed court has overruled part of this case’s holding. City of Dayton v. Rogers was overruled in part. The Supreme Court of Ohio expressly overruled its holding that unsworn false oral statements to police cannot violate Ohio’s obstructing official business law.
More on how this was screened

Later courts continue to apply its separate rule about preserving a sufficiency challenge in a bench trial. The confirmed treatment is listed below. All 44 flagged citations have been read.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

44 later cases cite City of Dayton v. Rogers; 44 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on City of Dayton v. Rogers?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Overruled in part

  • The Supreme Court of Ohio overruled Dayton’s rule that an unsworn false oral statement to a public official cannot violate the obstructing official business law.

    State v. Lazzaro · Supreme Court of Ohio · filed

    Therefore, we hold that the making of an unsworn false oral statement to a public official with the purpose to mislead, hamper or impede the investigation of a crime is punishable conduct within the meaning of R.C. 2921.13(A)(3) and 2921.31(A). Our decisions in Columbus v. Fisher and Dayton v. Rogers are hereby overruled.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads City of Dayton v. Rogers and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace