Case Citator › New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen

New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
597 U.S. 1
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
496 of 496
Citing cases (total)
2,264
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen remains good law after review of all 496 flagged citations; no adverse treatment was confirmed. Most reviewed opinions reported Bruen's displacement of earlier circuit precedent or rejected arguments that it silently overruled other firearm precedent.
More on how this was screened

United States v. Rahimi, United States v. Hemani, and Wolford v. Lopez applied Bruen's historical-analogy method. Withdrawn and vacated citing opinions were excluded.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

2,264 later cases cite New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen; 496 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 496 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace