Case Citator › United States v. Robert Fine, Aka: Anosh Toufigh, Aka: Jacob Maarse, Aka: Jack Patterson

United States v. Robert Fine, Aka: Anosh Toufigh, Aka: Jacob Maarse, Aka: Jack Patterson

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Ninth Circuit
Citation
963 F.2d 1258
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
221 of 221
Citing cases (total)
6,792
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. United States v. Robert Fine remains good law as a rehearing order. All 221 flagged citations have been read, and no adverse treatment of the order was confirmed.
More on how this was screened

Most opinions cite Ferdik v. Bonzelet at the same reporter citation for civil dismissal or pleading rules. United States v. Woods reports that Fine's earlier panel opinion was set for rehearing; it does not treat this order adversely.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

6,792 later cases cite United States v. Robert Fine, Aka: Anosh Toufigh, Aka: Jacob Maarse, Aka: Jack Patterson; 221 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on United States v. Robert Fine, Aka: Anosh Toufigh, Aka: Jacob Maarse, Aka: Jack Patterson?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 221 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads United States v. Robert Fine, Aka: Anosh Toufigh, Aka: Jacob Maarse, Aka: Jack Patterson and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace