Case Citator › United States v. Kimmy Lee Woodard

United States v. Kimmy Lee Woodard

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Eleventh Circuit
Citation
938 F.2d 1255
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
38 of 38
Citing cases (total)
38
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. United States v. Kimmy Lee Woodard remains good law: all 38 citing opinions selected for review have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. Later courts relied on its rule that an Eleventh Circuit panel follows prior circuit precedent unless an authorized decision or a clear statutory change displaces it.
More on how this was screened

The adverse language in those opinions concerned other decisions, including Doyle v. University of Alabama in Birmingham and Cotnam v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

38 later cases cite United States v. Kimmy Lee Woodard; 38 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on United States v. Kimmy Lee Woodard?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 38 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads United States v. Kimmy Lee Woodard and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace