Case Citator › Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister, Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul Adams

Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister, Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul Adams

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Sixth Circuit
Citation
898 F.2d 1196
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
30 of 30
Citing cases (total)
30
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall remains good law after all 30 flagged citations were read. None of the citing opinions adversely treated it.
More on how this was screened

Later courts continue to cite its rule that a claim may be dismissed as frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

30 later cases cite Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister, Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul Adams; 30 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister, Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul Adams?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 30 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister, Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul Adams and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace