Case Citator › Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department

Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Overruled in part
Court
Ninth Circuit
Citation
839 F.2d 621
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
93 of 93
Citing cases (total)
385
Treatment dates
2012

Status

Overruled in part
A reviewed court has overruled part of this case’s holding. All 93 flagged citations to Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department have been read. The Ninth Circuit's decision in AE ex rel. Hernandez v. County of Tulare ended Karim-Panahi's rule that a bare allegation of municipal policy suffices to plead a § 1983 claim.
More on how this was screened

Loescher v. County of Plumas later identified that change. Karim-Panahi's other holdings, including liberal construction of pro se pleadings and the ability to sue California municipal police departments under § 1983, remain unaffected.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

385 later cases cite Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department; 93 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Overruled in part

  • The Ninth Circuit replaced its former bare allegation rule for municipal liability claims with a requirement to plead facts that plausibly support the claim.

    AE ex rel. Hernandez v. County of Tulare · Ninth Circuit · filed

    Second, the factual allegations that are taken as true must plausibly suggest an entitlement to relief, such that it is not unfair to require the opposing party to be subjected to the expense of discovery and continued litigation. Starr, 652 F.3d at 1216. This standard applies to Monell claims and should govern future pleadings in this case.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace