Peter Bistrian v. Troy Levi
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Fisher v. Hollingsworth recognized that Egbert v. Boule displaced that holding. Bistrian's rejection of Bivens remedies for punitive detention and First Amendment retaliation was outside Fisher's adverse ruling.
42 later cases cite Peter Bistrian v. Troy Levi; 42 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Peter Bistrian v. Troy Levi?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Abrogated
-
The Third Circuit recognized that Egbert displaced Bistrian's holding allowing a Bivens failure-to-protect claim arising from inmate-on-inmate violence.
Fisher v. Hollingsworth · Third Circuit · filed
Because Bistrian and Shorter took a more lenient approach than Egbert, we now recognize their abrogation.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Peter Bistrian v. Troy Levi and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace