Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
Many later district court opinions continued to apply Washington's separate rule permitting dismissal when an affirmative defense is obvious from the complaint.
60 later cases cite Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department; 60 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Declined to follow
-
The Third Circuit rejected Washington's rule that a complaint dismissed under both Heck and Preiser is a mixed dismissal that cannot count as a PLRA strike.
Garrett v. Murphy · Third Circuit · filed
While habeas proceedings are not civil actions under the PLRA, we reject the Ninth Circuit’s conclusion that dismissals under both Heck and Preiser are therefore “mixed” dismissals that do not count as strikes.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Washington v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace