Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The confirmed treatment is listed below. All 37 flagged citations have been read; later opinions continue to apply Fox's separate holding on the duty of a party that takes control of an elevator.
37 later cases cite Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.; 37 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co.?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Texas Supreme Court expressly overruled Fox's requirement that each specific negligence issue be submitted separately to the jury.
Burk Royalty Co. v. Walls · Supreme Court of Texas · filed
We now expressly overrule those cases that arose before the 1973 revision of Rule 277 and which followed the mandate of Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co. requiring a submission of “each issue distinctly and separately, avoiding all intermingling” and stating “issues should be restricted to specific acts of negligence alleged and proven.”
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Gussie Fox v. Dallas Hotel Co. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace