State v. Williams
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Third District also declined to follow that rule in Village of McComb v. Andrews. Both treatments are listed below; Williams's suppression-review framework remains unaffected.
969 later cases cite State v. Williams; 95 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on State v. Williams?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Abrogated
-
The Supreme Court of Ohio displaced Williams's minor-violation rule by holding that reasonable suspicion or probable cause for even a minor traffic offense makes a stop valid.
Dayton v. Erickson · Supreme Court of Ohio · filed
We conclude that where an officer has an articulable reasonable suspicion or probable cause to stop a motorist for any criminal violation, including a minor traffic violation, the stop is constitutionally valid
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads State v. Williams and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace