Case Citator › Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska

Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Ninth Circuit
Citation
673 F.2d 266
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
513 of 513
Citing cases (total)
4,632
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska remains good law: every flagged citation has been read and no adverse treatment was confirmed. The citing opinions applied Ivey's rules that liberal construction cannot supply missing claim elements and that vague, conclusory allegations of official participation are insufficient.
More on how this was screened

Nearby “overruled,” “abrogated,” and “superseded by statute” language instead concerned other authorities, including Loux v. Rhay, King v. Atiyeh, Redman v. County of San Diego, Ellis v. Cassidy, and Noll v. Carlson.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

4,632 later cases cite Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska; 513 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 513 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace