Case Citator › Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. Hyde

Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. Hyde

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Ninth Circuit
Citation
622 F.2d 458
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
57 of 57
Citing cases (total)
57
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories remains good law in this review: all 57 flagged citations have been read, with no confirmed adverse treatment. Later courts continued to cite its rule that a pro se prisoner's civil rights complaint should receive an opportunity for amendment unless it is clear the defect cannot be cured.
Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

57 later cases cite Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. Hyde; 57 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. Hyde?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 57 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Preston Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories Hospital Staff of Arizona State Prison Dr. Clements Dr. Hyde and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace