Kevin Armstrong v. Board of School Directors of the City of Milwaukee
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Seventh Circuit's treatment in Felzen v. Andreas is listed below; later courts continue to use Armstrong's separate rules for reviewing class action settlements.
50 later cases cite Kevin Armstrong v. Board of School Directors of the City of Milwaukee; 50 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Kevin Armstrong v. Board of School Directors of the City of Milwaukee?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Seventh Circuit overruled Armstrong's rule allowing a person who was not a party to appeal a class action decision.
Felzen v. Andreas · Seventh Circuit · filed
Lest doubt linger, we now formally overrule Asgrow Seed and any other case in this circuit (including Armstrong v. Board of School Directors, 616 F.2d 305, 327-28 (7th Cir.1980), and Patterson v. Stovall, 528 F.2d 108, 109 n. 1 (7th Cir.1976)) that permits non-parties to appeal from a decision of any kind in a class action.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Kevin Armstrong v. Board of School Directors of the City of Milwaukee and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace