Case Citator › Morgan v. Morgensen

Morgan v. Morgensen

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Ninth Circuit
Citation
465 F.3d 1041
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
49 of 49
Citing cases (total)
49
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Good law: all 49 flagged citations have been read, and none shows adverse treatment of Morgan v. Morgensen. Later courts continue to cite its Eighth Amendment rules for prison conditions, including its holding that a prisoner's voluntary job application does not waive protection against being ordered to use known dangerous equipment.
More on how this was screened

The published opinion's caption is Morgan v. Canady; the reporter citation and opinion text identify the same decision listed here as Morgan v. Morgensen. The Schroeder opinion's reference to volume 465 F.3d cites another case and does not cite Morgan.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

49 later cases cite Morgan v. Morgensen; 49 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Morgan v. Morgensen?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 49 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Morgan v. Morgensen and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace