Case Citator › In re: Cary Michael Lambrix

In re: Cary Michael Lambrix

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Eleventh Circuit
Citation
776 F.3d 789
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
94 of 94
Citing cases (total)
122
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Good law: all 94 flagged citations have been read, and no adverse treatment of In re Cary Michael Lambrix was confirmed. The reviewed opinions applied Lambrix's rule that published three-judge orders on second-or-successive applications bind later Eleventh Circuit panels, cited its law-of-the-case analysis, or used nearby treatment language for another authority.
More on how this was screened

United States v. Michael St. Hubert reaffirmed Lambrix's rule; separate rehearing writings criticized the practice but did not speak for the court. One later-vacated opinion supplied no live treatment. The newly read In re Jones opinion did not cite or discuss Lambrix.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

122 later cases cite In re: Cary Michael Lambrix; 94 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on In re: Cary Michael Lambrix?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 94 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads In re: Cary Michael Lambrix and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace