Case Citator › Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey

Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Fourth Circuit
Citation
775 F.3d 170
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
70 of 70
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Jackson v. Lightsey remains good law: all 70 flagged citations have been read, and none of the citing opinions adversely treated it. Later courts applied Jackson's rules on the scope of an appeal, the construction of prisoner filings, and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.
More on how this was screened

Nearby statements about abrogation or overruling concerned other decisions, including Whisenant v. Yuam, United States v. Winestock, Miltier v. Beorn, and Randall v. Prince George's County.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

70 citations to Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 70 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Samuel Jackson v. Joseph Lightsey and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace