Case Citator › United States v. Slaughter

United States v. Slaughter

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Overruled in part
Court
Fifth Circuit
Citation
238 F.3d 580
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
70 of 70
Citing cases (total)
70
Treatment dates
2001

Status

Overruled in part
A reviewed court has overruled part of this case’s holding. The Fifth Circuit withdrew its August 2000 opinion in United States v. Slaughter and replaced its drug-quantity conclusion on rehearing; all 70 flagged citations have been read, and the court's direct action is listed below. The court reinstated the rest of the original opinion in a published revised decision.
More on how this was screened

Later opinions citing 238 F.3d 580 refer to that revised decision and supply no further adverse treatment of the withdrawn text. Rely on the revised opinion rather than the August 2000 version.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

70 later cases cite United States v. Slaughter; 70 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on United States v. Slaughter?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Overruled in part

  • The Fifth Circuit withdrew its original Slaughter opinion and deleted its final paragraph, which had rejected the drug-quantity jury-finding claim under earlier precedent.

    United States v. Slaughter · Fifth Circuit · filed

    By Order entered October 13, 2000, we granted appellant’s motion for rehearing and withdrew the original per curiam opinion. Having now considered the supplemental briefs filed by the parties, we take the following action: 1. We reinstate the entirety of the original opinion as set forth in Attachment A except for the final paragraph, which is deleted.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads United States v. Slaughter and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace