Case Citator › Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals

Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Fourth Circuit
Citation
626 F.3d 187
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
149 of 149
Citing cases (total)
1,149
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals remains good law: all 149 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. The reviewed opinions applied Coleman positively for Rule 12(b)(6) plausibility, Title VII discrimination and comparator principles, or FMLA self-care sovereign immunity.
More on how this was screened

Nearby “abrogated” and “overruled” language concerned other authorities—including Clatterbuck, Hill, Jordan, Gross, Fort Bend County, and Price Waterhouse—rather than Coleman. The Supreme Court affirmed Coleman's FMLA self-care judgment.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

1,149 later cases cite Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals; 149 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 149 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Coleman v. Maryland Court of Appeals and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace