Turner v. General Motors Corp.
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The confirmed treatment is listed below: the Texas Supreme Court held that later legislation changed the required instructions. Turner's separate recognition of crashworthiness liability was not rejected in the opinions reviewed.
33 later cases cite Turner v. General Motors Corp.; 33 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Turner v. General Motors Corp.?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Superseded by statute
-
The court held that Texas's later products liability statute displaced Turner's rule on design defect jury instructions, which no longer states the law.
Emerson Electric Co. v. Johnson · Supreme Court of Texas · filed
Acord and Turner have been abrogated by intervening legislation affecting products-liability cases and no longer accurately state the law.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Turner v. General Motors Corp. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace