Case Citator › Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter

Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Limited by some courts
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
558 U.S. 100
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
94 of 94
Citing cases (total)
906
Treatment dates
2012
Limited by some courts
At least one reviewed court has limited this case’s holding to narrower facts or a narrower rule. No reviewed court has overruled it. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter remains good law, subject to the limitation listed below. All 94 flagged citations have been read.
More on how this was screened

The Third Circuit declined to extend Mohawk to appeals by subjects of grand jury investigations under the separate Perlman doctrine. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court chose a different rule for its own collateral order procedure, as noted below.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

906 later cases cite Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter; 94 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Limited

  • The Third Circuit declined to extend Mohawk to preclude Perlman appeals by subjects of grand-jury investigations.

    In re Grand Jury · Third Circuit · filed

    Contrary to the Government’s suggestion, we decline to hold that the Supreme Court’s decision in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100, 130 S.Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009), precludes Perlman appeals by grand jury subjects.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace