Case Citator › Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services

Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Tenth Circuit
Citation
519 F.3d 1242
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
119 of 119
Citing cases (total)
3,575
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services remains good law: all 119 flagged citations have been read, and none adversely treated the decision. The opinions repeatedly applied Robbins's context-dependent plausibility standard and its requirement that a Section 1983 complaint identify who did what to whom, especially when multiple defendants assert qualified immunity.
More on how this was screened

Most nearby “overruled” language instead reported Robbins's treatment of Kikumura v. Osagie or adverse history for unrelated authorities; “abrogated” language frequently concerned state sovereign immunity rather than Robbins. One citing opinion was withdrawn and replaced; neither version contained adverse treatment.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

3,575 later cases cite Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services; 119 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 119 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Robbins ex rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Human Services and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace