Tobin v. Garcia
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The Texas Supreme Court's later decision in Ackermann v. Vordenbaum confined Tobin's exception for appellate review of a denied summary judgment motion to cases matching Tobin's cross-motion posture. The other opinions read applied Tobin or discussed its own treatment of Rogers v. Royalty Pooling Co.
94 later cases cite Tobin v. Garcia; 94 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Tobin v. Garcia?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Limited
-
The Texas Supreme Court confined Tobin's exception permitting appellate review of a denied summary-judgment motion to cases in which all real parties moved for summary judgment and the appeal followed the grant of one or more motions.
Ackermann v. Vordenbaum · Supreme Court of Texas · filed
The safer rule is one restricting the Tobin-Garcia doctrine to its factual situation and that disclosed in Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. McBride, that is, to cases in which motions for summary judgment have been filed by all of the real parties at interest and the appeal is prosecuted from a judgment granting one or more of them.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Tobin v. Garcia and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace