Case Citator › Yarborough v. Alvarado

Yarborough v. Alvarado

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
541 U.S. 652
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
134 of 134
Citing cases (total)
3,472
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Yarborough v. Alvarado remains good law: all 134 flagged citations have been read, with no adverse treatment confirmed. J. D. B. v. North Carolina held on de novo review that a child's objectively apparent age informs Miranda custody, but explained that Yarborough's AEDPA holding did not decide whether excluding age was correct on de novo review.
More on how this was screened

The other opinions applied Yarborough's AEDPA deference or objective custody rules, referred to separate writings or other cases, or directed nearby adverse language at unrelated issues. One restrictive panel opinion was vacated on en banc rehearing and supplies no treatment.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

3,472 later cases cite Yarborough v. Alvarado; 134 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Yarborough v. Alvarado?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 134 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Yarborough v. Alvarado and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace