Abebe v. Mukasey
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
All 63 flagged citations have been read. The two confirmed treatments are listed below.
63 later cases cite Abebe v. Mukasey; 63 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Abebe v. Mukasey?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Declined to follow
-
The Third Circuit rejected Abebe's rule that a claim identified in a Board of Immigration Appeals notice of appeal becomes unexhausted when the petitioner omits it from a later brief.
Hoxha v. Holder · Third Circuit · filed
Case law in both the Sixth and Ninth Circuits is contrary to our holding. ... Abebe v. Mukasey, ... Having examined these cases, we do not find them persuasive.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener → -
The Eleventh Circuit kept its own section 212(c) framework and said its precedent prevented it from adopting Abebe's contrary approach.
De La Rosa v. U.S. Attorney General · Eleventh Circuit · filed
Our long-standing endorsement of Francis precludes us from considering the route taken by the Ninth Circuit in Abebe.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Abebe v. Mukasey and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace