Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
None of the citing opinions reviewed adversely treated its personal jurisdiction holdings; the opinions applied those holdings, addressed other decisions, or made no ruling about Burger King. The four previously unavailable opinions—Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hiatt (1189760), Von Briesen, Purtell & Roper, S.C. v. French (2887362), Breneman v. Slusher (2089904), and Arthur Holk and Andy Holk v. USA Managed Care Organization (2868791)—were retrieved and read. SPV Osus Ltd. v. UBS AG (8439786) contained no Burger King reference in its retrieved text, so it produced no entry. The same was true of the previously reviewed source mismatches 7083915, 2894733, and 2897914.
12,147 later cases cite Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz; 474 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.
Every one of the 474 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace