Delaware v. Prouse
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
The other reviewed opinions applied Prouse's prohibition on suspicionless discretionary vehicle stops, followed its balancing test, applied its express checkpoint boundary, reported Prouse's own effect on older precedent, or placed adverse language on unrelated cases. Higbie v. State is not listed because its refusal to extend Prouse to sobriety checkpoints was expressly overruled after Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz.
5,345 later cases cite Delaware v. Prouse; 87 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading; 79 of them have been read, and the text of 8 citing opinions could not be retrieved, so those remain unread. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Delaware v. Prouse?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Limited
-
The Supreme Court of New Jersey held Prouse's exclusionary rule nonretroactive and available only when the random traffic stop occurred after Prouse was decided.
State v. Carpentieri · Supreme Court of New Jersey · filed
We reverse. Delaware v. Prouse, supra, applies only to those cases wherein the “random traffic stop” occurs after the date of the Prouse decision, March 27, 1979.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Delaware v. Prouse and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace