Younger v. Harris
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
14,568 later cases cite Younger v. Harris; 378 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Younger v. Harris?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Limited
-
The Supreme Court confined Younger abstention to ongoing state criminal prosecutions, certain civil enforcement proceedings, and civil proceedings involving orders uniquely necessary to state courts’ judicial functions.
Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs · Supreme Court of the United States · filed
We have not applied Younger outside these three "exceptional" categories, and today hold, in accord with NOPSI, that they define Younger's scope. ... In short, to guide other federal courts, we today clarify and affirm that Younger extends to the three "exceptional circumstances" identified in NOPSI, but no further.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Younger v. Harris and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace