Case Citator › Delli Paoli v. United States

Delli Paoli v. United States

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Overruled
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Citation
352 U.S. 232
Decided
Confirmed treatments
2
Flagged citations read
156 of 156
Citing cases (total)
156
Treatment dates
1965–1968

Status

Overruled
A reviewed court has overruled this case. Delli Paoli v. United States has been overruled. All 156 flagged citations have been processed; 2 confirmed adverse treatments are listed below.
Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

156 later cases cite Delli Paoli v. United States; 156 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Delli Paoli v. United States?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Overruled

  • The Supreme Court overruled Delli Paoli and held that admitting a nontestifying codefendant's confession implicating the defendant at their joint trial violated the Confrontation Clause despite a limiting instruction.

    Bruton v. United States · Supreme Court of the United States · filed

    We have concluded, however, that Delli Paoli should be overruled. We hold that, because of the substantial risk that the jury, despite instructions to the contrary, looked to the incriminating extrajudicial statements in determining petitioner’s guilt, admission of Evans’ confession in this joint trial violated petitioner’s right of cross-examination secured by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. We therefore overrule Delli Paoli and reverse.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Declined to Follow

  • The California Supreme Court rejected Delli Paoli's limiting-instruction practice as unfair and adopted a stricter state rule requiring effective redaction, severance, or exclusion.

    People v. Aranda · Supreme Court of California · filed

    In Delli Paoli v. United States, 352 U.S. 232 [77 S.Ct. 294, 1 L.Ed.2d 278], the Supreme Court of the United States approved this rule in joint trials in the federal courts. ... Whether or not it is constitutionally permissible, the practice is prejudicial and unfair to the nondeclarant defendant and must be altered.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Delli Paoli v. United States and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace