Stephen Bernard Wlodarz v. State of Tennessee
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
That treatment is listed below. Later courts continued to cite Wlodarz for its other rules on newly discovered evidence and statutory interpretation.
33 later cases cite Stephen Bernard Wlodarz v. State of Tennessee; 33 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Stephen Bernard Wlodarz v. State of Tennessee?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Overruled in part
-
The Tennessee Supreme Court overturned Wlodarz's rule permitting a defendant to attack a guilty plea through a coram nobis petition.
Clark D. Frazier v. State of Tennessee · Tennessee Supreme Court · filed
We hold that the coram nobis statute is not available as a procedural mechanism for collaterally attacking a guilty plea. We overturn Wlodarz and any other Tennessee cases holding otherwise.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Stephen Bernard Wlodarz v. State of Tennessee and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace