Statute Annotations › Guam › 9 Guam Code Ann. § 80.37

9 Guam Code Ann. § 80.37

Deadly-weapon felony enhancement: the cases that interpreted this section

Jurisdiction
Guam
Case notes
4
Cited in passing
3
Citing cases indexed
7
Case dates
1985–1998
Screened through
1998-05-05
Courts' treatment: live
No reviewed case has held this section invalid, preempted, superseded or repealed.
This reflects what the reviewed cases said, not legislative action: a later amendment or repeal by the legislature would not appear here unless a reviewed case discussed it.

7 citing cases reviewed: 4 interpreted the section (annotated below), 3 cited it only in passing. Cases filed after 1998-05-05 may not have been reviewed yet.

Have a situation under 9 Guam Code Ann. § 80.37?

These notes show how courts have ruled. Ask about your specific facts and see which of these rulings apply, with citations you can check.

Deadly weapon enhancement—Consecutive sentences

Section 80.37 requires punishment for using a deadly weapon to be added to the underlying felony punishment and served consecutively.

The People of the Territory of Guam v. Taisipic · filed 1988-07-08

Under the Guam enhancement statute, punishment for the use of a deadly weapon shall be imposed “in addition to [the punishment for the underlying felony]” and “shall not run concurrently.” 9 Guam Code Ann. § 80.37 (1982); ... Thus, there was no error as to the consecutive sentences imposed in case no. 12F-85.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 80.37 authorizes cumulative punishment for using a deadly weapon in a felony, including when the underlying felony is aggravated assault under § 19.20(a)(1).

People of the Territory of Guam v. Snaer · filed 1985-06-28

Guam has clearly indicated its desire to impose cumulative sanctions on those who use deadly weapons in the commission of felonies. ... Use of a deadly weapon is simply not an element of a § 19.20(a)(1) offense.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Deadly weapon possession or use during a felony

Section 80.37 requires an additional five-to-twenty-five-year prison term when a person unlawfully possesses or uses a deadly weapon while committing any felony, including inducing or aiding a murder.

The People of the Territory of Guam v. John Junior Pangelinan · filed 1998-05-05

The trial court properly denied Pangelinan's motion for acquittal of the special allegation of possession or use of a deadly weapon in the commission of a felony. Guam law mandates that "[w]hoever unlawfully possesses or uses a deadly weapon in the commission of a felony punishable under the laws of Guam shall, in addition to the punishment imposed for the commission of such felony, be imprisoned for a term of not less than five (5) years nor more than twenty-five (25) years." 9 Guam Code Ann. § 80.37 (1996). The jury heard sufficient evidence to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Pangelinan's conduct fit squarely within section 80.37: as Pangelinan himself concedes and witnesses' testimony bears out, Pangelinan supplied the gun to Angoco to kill Datuin. Thus, Pangelinan possessed the gun during the commission of a felony--namely, inducing or aiding Angoco to murder Datuin. See Guam v. Iglesias, 839 F.2d 628, 629 (9th Cir.1988) (finding that section 80.37 "contains no exceptions and applies to all felonies"). Accordingly, we uphold Pangelinan's sentence enhancement.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Special parole—concurrent service

Section 80.37 permits its special-parole term to run concurrently with a general-parole term.

PEOPLE of the Territory of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro D. MATERNE, Defendant-Appellant · filed 1995-12-12

Applying the rule, special parole under section 80.37 should be allowed to run concurrently with general parole under section 80.70.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
3 more cases cited this section only in passing

These cases mention the section without interpreting it (a string cite, a footnote, background). Listed so you can see the full citation record, not just the annotated rulings.

The People of the Territory of Guam v. Reyes, the court mentions § 80.37 only to identify the charge against Reyes and in a supporting footnote. It does not interpret the statute, discuss its requirements, or decide how it applies. opinion →
People of the Territory of Guam v. Tedtaotao, the statute is mentioned only in the factual and procedural history to identify the enhanced-sentence consequence of the deadly-weapon charges. The court does not interpret, apply, or decide any issue concerning § 80.37. opinion →
The People of the Territory of Guam v. Ibanez, the opinion mentions § 80.37 only in describing the offenses for which Ibanez was convicted. The court does not interpret, apply, or decide any issue about that statute. opinion →

Which of these rulings fit your facts?

Describe your situation under 9 Guam Code Ann. § 80.37. Ezel checks it against the cases on this page and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace