Federal Agency Decisions
Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC), mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), and environmental appeals from the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board, each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.
No decisions match these filters
Try fewer or different words, check the spelling, or clear the filters to browse everything.
Secretary of Labor v. Consol Buchanan Mining Company, LLC
Two fatal-accident violations affirmed with $140,000 penalty
While miners were transporting a shuttle car through Buchanan Mine #1, the load struck a pressurized-water manifold and tore it from the mine's firefighting line. A damaged 1½-inch valve that had previously been torn apart was reused in the assembly, and the upstream 6-inch shutoff valve could not…
Nats Creek Mining Company
Ten citations and two imminent-danger orders affirmed
Nats Creek Mining operated the Sugarloaf No. 2 underground coal mine in Kentucky. After a fatal accident involving a scoop operator, MSHA cited the mine for missing or inoperative methane monitors and an inoperative fire-suppression system on scoops. MSHA also cited an underground battery charging…
Consolidation Coal Company
Partial settlement approved and citation transferred
Consolidation Coal Company faced 13 alleged violations at the Osage No. 3 Mine. Judge George A. Koutras approved settlements for 11 citations, then approved a settlement for Citation 3716124 after the parties agreed to delete its S&S designation and reduce the penalty from $276 to $166. The…
Energy West Mining Company
Several citations modified and one vacated
Energy West Mining Company faced civil penalty proceedings involving eight alleged violations at the Cottonwood Mine, with four enforcement documents litigated at hearing. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. approved the parties' resolution of two citations, affirmed one citation, modified two others by…
Beech Fork Processing, Inc.
Non-S&S findings affirmed
Beech Fork Processing was cited twice after firefighting equipment at its mine was not maintained in usable and operative condition. The judge found that the violations of 30 C.F.R. § 75.1100-3 were not significant and substantial because the evidence did not show that a fire was reasonably likely…
Andalex Resources, Inc.
Fire and escapeway citations split
Andalex Resources contested citations involving an inoperative fire suppression system and leaking drive-through doors that compromised separate underground escapeways. Judge John J. Morris found the fire suppression violation significant and substantial, and he affirmed the two escapeway…
LJ'S Coal Corporation
Multiple mine-safety violations adjudicated
LJ'S Coal Corporation faced consolidated proceedings involving roof control, accident reporting, fire suppression, dust-control planning, roadway berms, and underground electrical safety at its No. 3 and No. 4 Mines. Judge Avram Weisberger found several serious and significant-and-substantial…
Day Branch Coal Company Inc.
Roof and fire-suppression violations affirmed
Day Branch Coal Company operated an underground coal mine. MSHA alleged that miners traveled under unsupported roof, warning devices were missing, roof supports did not follow the mine plan, roof bolts were damaged, and a conveyor-belt fire-suppression system was inoperative. The judge found the…
What these documents are
- The agencies: Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC), mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), and environmental permit and penalty appeals from the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board (EAB). Each decision page names its agency.
- Commission and Board decisions: Rulings by the agency's highest review level (the Commission at OSHRC and FMSHRC, the Environmental Appeals Board at EPA). These are citable as precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
- ALJ decisions: Rulings by the agency's Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order that binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent: under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j) at OSHRC, and after the 40-day window of 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) at FMSHRC.
- Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
- Where they come from: Every page links the official public release from the deciding agency, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.