Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
12 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.404(b)(1)(ii)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Summit Contractors Inc.

Multi-employer electrical citation affirmed

Summit Contractors supplied a generator and spider box without ground-fault circuit interrupter protection for subcontractor employees at an apartment construction project. The Commission overruled its earlier Summit decision and restored its precedent allowing citations to controlling and creating…

August 19, 2010
Citations affirmed
ALJ

CB&I Constructors, Inc.

GFCI citation against general contractor vacated

CB&I was the general contractor for an elevated water tower where an electrical subcontractor had an extension cord without visible ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection connected to a conduit threader. The judge found that the Secretary did not prove the outlet was single-phase and rated at…

July 28, 2003 ·Ken S. Welsch
Citations vacated
ALJ

New England Synthetic Systems, Inc.

Scaffold and electrical violations affirmed for $30,000

New England Synthetic Systems replaced exterior walls at an apartment complex in Weymouth, Massachusetts. Judge Robert A. Yetman affirmed violations involving unprotected temporary electrical wiring, lifelines tied to vent curbing and exposed to sharp edges, incomplete scaffold planking, unsafe…

April 22, 1999 ·Robert A. Yetman
Mixed result
ALJ

Minelli Construction Company, Inc.

Mixed ruling on bridge rehabilitation safety citations

Minelli Construction Company was a subcontractor performing rehabilitation work on a New York Thruway bridge. OSHA cited the company for alleged hazards involving eye and face protection, hazard communication, fall protection, electrical equipment, suspended scaffolds, access, and gasoline storage…

July 1, 1996 ·Robert A. Yetman
Mixed result
COMM

GEM Industrial, Inc.

Reviewed steel tag-line item withdrawn by settlement

GEM Industrial, Inc. was a structural-steel subcontractor on an Ohio building project. The administrative law judge had affirmed a serious tag-line violation for crane loads during steel shakeout and assessed $1,300, along with a separate $1,625 electrical violation. Review was directed on the…

June 7, 1995
Settled
COMM

Centex-Rooney Construction Co.

Repeated fall-protection violations affirmed with $25,000 in penalties

Centex-Rooney was the general contractor for construction of two-story hotel buildings at a Florida resort. OSHA cited one defective ground-fault circuit interrupter, uncovered pipe-chase openings, and inadequate perimeter guardrails. The Commission vacated the electrical item because regular…

December 2, 1994
Mixed result
ALJ

Southern Forming, Inc.

Broad safety violations affirmed at $69,150

Southern Forming, also known as Suncrete Construction, performed concrete formwork at construction sites in Sunny Isles and Delray Beach, Florida. At the Sunny Isles site, an employee fell to his death from a stairway, and OSHA's investigation identified numerous fall-protection, stairway…

February 7, 1994 ·Paul L. Brady
Modified
ALJ

Metro Power, d/b/a Gibson Electric

Floor-opening item affirmed, breaker-panel item vacated

Metro Power, doing business as Gibson Electric, was the electrical subcontractor on a youth facility construction project in Georgia. The judge affirmed a ground-fault circuit interrupter violation because the outlet serving drink and ice machines did not have functioning protection, but classified…

March 22, 1993 ·Nancy J. Spies
Mixed result
COMM

Mautz & Oren, Inc.

EAJA fee request denied after citation withdrawal

Mautz & Oren was cited for a repeat electrical violation after OSHA found that its construction site used neither ground-fault circuit interrupters nor an assured equipment grounding conductor program. The Secretary later withdrew the citation during Commission review, making Mautz the prevailing…

March 8, 1993
Procedural
COMM

Blount International, LTD.

Storage and electrical items affirmed, crane item vacated

Blount International was the general contractor building an aircraft hangar at Westover Air Force Base. The Commission affirmed a material-storage item because heavy structural steel was stored on deteriorated supports in a way that could allow it to spread or tilt. It also affirmed two electrical…

September 18, 1992
Mixed result
COMM

R & R Builders, Inc.

Safety-belt violation remains willful

R & R Builders was a drywall subcontractor cited for safety-program, training, safety-belt, guardrail, and ground-fault protection violations at a condominium project. The Commission affirmed the safety-program, training, safety-belt, and guardrail items, but reduced three of them from willful to a…

November 25, 1991
Modified
COMM

R & R Builders, Inc.

Motion to sever GFCI item denied for lack of good cause

The Secretary asked the Commission to sever and finalize an affirmed ground-fault-circuit-interrupter item so it could support future repeated citations and encourage compliance at other worksites. The Commission held that Federal Rule 54(b) is intended to permit immediate appeals and is not the…

July 20, 1990
Procedural

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.