Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
17 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Cranesville Block Co.

Review withdrawn and judge's ruling made final

The judge decided three consolidated dockets involving related Cranesville companies. The Secretary petitioned for Commission review only of issues in two companion dockets, not docket 10-0447. The Commission therefore severed 10-0447 and vacated its direction for review of that case. The judge's…

April 26, 2013
Procedural
ALJ

Dierzen-Kewanee Heavy Industries, LTD

Unabated hazards resulted in $133,100 in penalties

Dierzen-Kewanee manufactured dump-truck bodies at a former boiler factory in Illinois. After settling earlier OSHA citations, the company paid only the first penalty installment, did not provide requested abatement information, and left many cited conditions uncorrected for a follow-up inspection…

March 26, 2009 ·Nancy J. Spies
Modified
ALJ

Sanderson Farms, Inc.

Unstable freezer pallet storage resulted in a $6,300 penalty

Sanderson Farms stored 2,200-to-2,500-pound pallets of frozen chicken on an aging freezer rack system with frequently damaged legs and little margin for placement error. A maintenance employee died from smoke inhalation and burns after beginning to cut a damaged rack leg while loaded pallets…

September 24, 2008 ·Nancy J. Spies
Mixed result
COMM

Cagle’s, Inc.

Waste-breading hazard items partly affirmed

Cagle's operated a chicken-processing plant where two employees died in a waste-breading trailer after carbon dioxide created an oxygen-deficient atmosphere. OSHA alleged that the trailer was a permit-required confined space and that Cagle's failed to label containers and train employees about…

September 29, 2006
Mixed result
ALJ

North Atlantic Fish Company, Inc.

Broad fish-plant safety violations affirmed

OSHA's safety and health inspections of North Atlantic's Massachusetts fish-processing plant identified extensive fire, machine, electrical, chemical, respiratory, noise, storage, and powered-industrial-truck hazards. The judge affirmed most of the serious items, including general duty violations…

July 9, 2001 ·Michael H. Schoenfeld
Mixed result
ALJ

Dayton Hudson Corp.

Roofing and acetone violations affirmed with reduced penalties

Dayton Hudson employees performed roofing work on a flat roof in West Allis, Wisconsin, about 28 feet above the next level. The company admitted that employees did not use available harnesses and that its warning-line system was incomplete, too loose, too close to the roof edge, and missing around…

May 26, 2000 ·James H. Barkley
Modified
ALJ

Aero Tec Laboratories, Inc.

Plant safety items largely affirmed with reduced penalties

Aero Tec manufactured fuel tanks and containment vessels at its New Jersey plant. The judge rejected its claim that OSHA had promised no penalties or exceeded the scope of consent because management accompanied the open inspection without objecting. The decision affirmed items involving an…

September 18, 1996 ·Richard DeBenedetto
Mixed result
COMM

American Airlines, Inc.

FAA ground-operations manual does not preempt OSHA guardrail and hazard-communication citations after a fatal fall

American Airlines ran an aircraft maintenance and repair facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma. After a worker fell from the third story of a roughly 27-foot mobile "tail stand" work platform through unguarded floor openings to the ground and died, OSHA inspected and issued citations across two dockets…

February 23, 1996
Citations affirmed
ALJ

General Cutlery Co., Inc.

Knife maker loses on almost every safety and health citation, including a willful hazard-communication violation

General Cutlery makes bayonets and household knives in Fremont, Ohio. After complaint inspections in May 1994, OSHA issued two sets of citations, later consolidated: safety violations (Docket No. 94-2015) and health violations (Docket No. 94-1933). The company, represented by its president, argued…

November 27, 1995 ·Paul L. Brady
Mixed result
ALJ

Pit-Stop, Inc. (Uniroyal Pitstop)

Unguarded service pit affirmed as a serious violation, $100

Pit-Stop, Inc., operating as Uniroyal Pitstop in Midwest City, Oklahoma, ran an automotive shop where workers used floor pits about 3 feet wide, 5 feet deep, and 10 feet long to reach the underside of vehicles for oil changes and grease jobs. OSHA cited the shop after an inspection found several of…

July 25, 1994 ·Paul L. Brady
Citations affirmed
COMM

Halocarbon Products Corporation

Commission approves $5,500 chemical-safety settlement

Halocarbon Products manufactured specialty chemicals at a New Jersey plant where OSHA investigated after a reported chemical exposure hospitalized two employees, one of whom later died. OSHA alleged general-duty, respirator-program, and hazard-communication violations and initially proposed $37,000…

April 13, 1994
Settled
ALJ

CNG Transmission Corporation

Mixed ruling on frac-tank hazards

CNG Transmission was preparing a natural-gas field for underground storage and used workers supplied by Union Drilling to monitor a frac-fluid flow-back operation. After the piping was changed so that fluid and gas flowed directly into a frac tank, two night-shift workers were found inside the tank…

March 11, 1994 ·Nancy J. Spies
Mixed result
ALJ

Air Plastics, Inc.

Mixed ruling on pit hazards and chemical training

Air Plastics manufactured fiberglass tanks using molds mounted over production pits that employees entered during setup. The judge vacated a failure-to-abate general duty clause citation alleging hazardous confined-space atmospheres because OSHA did not prove that employees faced a significant risk…

October 12, 1993 ·John H. Frye, III
Mixed result
ALJ

Metal Recycling Company

Scrap-yard hazards yield mixed ruling and $400 penalty

OSHA inspected Metal Recycling Company's three-employee scrap-metal facility in El Paso, Texas, and issued a serious citation with multiple items. The judge affirmed serious violations involving unsecured access stairs, an exit leading into a blocked and fenced yard, obstructed aisles, hazardous…

June 14, 1993 ·Stanley M. Schwartz
Mixed result
COMM

Trinity Industries, Inc.

Full-scope inspection warrant upheld

Trinity manufactured tanks and pressure vessels at a Sharonville, Ohio, facility. After an employee complaint, OSHA obtained a warrant authorizing a limited complaint inspection, a records review, and a full-scope inspection if neutral administrative-plan criteria were met. The facility's…

August 18, 1992
Citations affirmed
COMM

Conagra Flour Milling Co. & Its Successors

Flour-mill electrical and blowdown violations affirmed

Conagra operated a seven-story flour mill in Sherman, Texas, where combustible grain dust made the milling floors Class II, Division 2 hazardous locations. The Commission affirmed serious violations for using a grain tester and pedestal fan with exposed motor components that did not meet the…

August 18, 1992
Citations affirmed
COMM

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

Particleboard hazard communication items vacated

OSHA cited Louisiana-Pacific's Montana particleboard plant for three alleged violations of the Hazard Communication Standard and proposed $1,000. The items concerned formaldehyde warnings on particleboard shipping labels, warnings on stationary formaldehyde tanks, and safety data sheets for…

May 24, 1990
Citations vacated

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.