TN Opinion No. 15-67 September 18, 2015

If a Tennessee church lets a school use part of its property, does the state's no-weapons-on-school-property law apply to the church grounds?

Short answer: Partly. The AG concluded the law applied only to the portions of church property actually being used by a school, and only while the school was using them. Home schooling was not covered.
Currency note: this opinion is from 2015
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Tennessee Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Tennessee attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked at the bottom of this page, or PDF in the sidebar) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Senator Mae Beavers asked five linked questions about how Tennessee's weapon-free school zone statute, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309, applies when a school operates out of church property or when a family home schools.

The AG's answers turned on the statute's language, which makes weapon possession a Class E felony (or Class B misdemeanor without intent to go armed) on "any other property owned, operated, or while in use by" a school. The AG read this to mean what it says, in two senses.

First, the geographic reach. If a school uses only part of a church campus (say, a separate classroom building or gym while the rest of the property runs church activities), the criminal prohibition applies only to that portion, not the entire campus. If the school takes over the whole property for a festival, it covers the whole property.

Second, the time reach. The prohibition runs only while the school is operating or using the property. When the school is not present, the property reverts to non-school status for purposes of the statute.

The AG also concluded that home schooling falls outside the statute. The statute lists "boards of education, schools, colleges or universities" and similar institutions, terminology that does not naturally include a family teaching its own children at home. Finally, the signage requirement in subsection (d) puts the duty to post warnings on the school's chief administrator, including for property the school uses but does not own.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2015. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: At the time, was carrying a gun on the entire church campus illegal if the church ran a school?
A: Not under this opinion. The AG read the statute as reaching only the portions the school actually operated or used, and only during the times of that operation. A church gymnasium used twice a week as a school's PE space would fall in scope during those PE periods, but not on Sunday mornings.

Q: Who decided which areas of a church campus counted as school property?
A: The AG identified the school's chief administrator as the person responsible for posting the required notice signs, which functionally identifies the school-use areas. The actual scope of school use is fact-dependent and would be answered case by case.

Q: Did this opinion cover home schooling?
A: No. The AG concluded home schooling fell outside the statute. The criminal prohibition reaches property "operated, or while in use by any board of education, school, college or university board of trustees, regents or directors." Home schooling is an alternative to a school, not a school in itself, so private property used for home schooling did not become "school property" for purposes of § 39-17-1309.

Q: What size and content did the warning signs need to be?
A: Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(d) required signs at least six inches by fourteen inches in prominent locations about the school stating: "FELONY. STATE LAW PRESCRIBES A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF SIX (6) YEARS IMPRISONMENT AND A FINE NOT TO EXCEED THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,000) FOR CARRYING WEAPONS ON SCHOOL PROPERTY."

Background and statutory framework

Tennessee Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 was the state's primary weapon-free school zone statute. Subsection (b)(1) defined a Class E felony for possessing a weapon "with the intent to go armed" on school property; subsection (c)(1)(A) defined a parallel Class B misdemeanor without the intent element. Both subsections reached not only schools' own property but also "any other property owned, operated, or while in use by" a school.

The AG looked to its prior opinion Tenn. Att'y Gen. Op. 09-160 (Sept. 8, 2009), which had reached the same conclusion when schools used parts of public parks: the statute extended to the portions the school used, while the school used them, and no further. That principle was carried over to property of religious institutions.

For home schooling, the AG relied on the ordinary meaning of "school" and "board of education" as institutional terms. A family teaching its own children was not a "school" within the statute's listed institutional categories.

Citations and references

Statutes:
- Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(b)(1) (Class E felony, weapons on school property with intent to go armed)
- Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(c)(1)(A) (Class B misdemeanor, weapons on school property)
- Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(d) (signage requirement)

Cases:
- State v. Pope, 427 S.W.3d 363 (Tenn. 2013) (statutory construction principles)
- State v. McNack, 356 S.W.3d 906 (Tenn. 2011) (plain meaning rule)
- Eastman Chem. Co. v. Johnson, 151 S.W.3d 503 (Tenn. 2004) (statutory interpretation)

Related AG opinions:
- Tenn. Att'y Gen. Op. 09-160 (Sept. 8, 2009) (firearms in parks when schools use portions of parks)

Source

Original opinion text

STATE OF TENNESSEE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
September 18, 2015

Opinion No. 15-67

Applicability of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 to Religious Institutions and Home Schooling

Question 1

If a church or other religious entity operates any form of school on church grounds or allows other entities to use church property for school purposes (e.g., classrooms, gym and/or sporting fields), is the property "school property" for the purposes of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309, which makes it a criminal offense to possess or carry weapons, including firearms, on school property?

Opinion 1

Yes, subject to the limitations and exceptions set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309, it is a criminal offense to possess or carry weapons, including firearms, on those portions of the property of a religious institution being used for school purposes.

Question 2

If the answer to Question 1 is yes, is it a criminal offense to possess or carry a firearm anywhere on the church property or only on those portions of the property being used for school purposes and, if only on those portions of the property being used for school purposes, how are those portions identified so that persons have adequate notice?

Opinion 2

The prohibition against carrying weapons applies only to those portions of the property of the religious institution being used for school purposes. What portions are being used for school purposes is a fact-dependent question and can only be answered on a case-by-case basis. Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-17-1309(d) places the obligation for proper notification on the school's administrator.

Question 3

If the answer to Question 1 is yes, does Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 apply at all times or only during those times when property is actively used for school purposes, and if it applies only while property is actively used for school purposes, how are those periods of time identified so that individuals have adequate notice?

Opinion 3

The prohibition against carrying a firearm on the property of a religious institution applies only while the property is being used or operated by the school. Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-17-1309(d) places the obligation for proper notification on the school's administrator.

Question 4

Does Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 apply to private property on which home schooling activities are carried out?

Opinion 4

No, home schooling appears to fall outside the scope of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309.

Question 5

Are the mandatory signage requirements contained in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(d) applicable to those properties that are "used" but not owned by a school?

Opinion 5

Yes, a school administrator should place signs compliant with the statute about the areas operated or used by the school while the areas are being operated or are in use by the school.

ANALYSIS

Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-17-1309(b)(1) currently sets forth the following Class E felony offense:

It is an offense for any person to possess or carry, whether openly or concealed, with the intent to go armed, any firearm, explosive, explosive weapon, bowie knife, hawk bill knife, ice pick, dagger, slingshot, leaded cane, switchblade knife, blackjack, knuckles or any other weapon of like kind, not used solely for instructional or school-sanctioned ceremonial purposes, in any public or private school building or bus, on any public or private school campus, grounds, recreation area, athletic field or any other property owned, operated, or while in use by any board of education, school, college or university board of trustees, regents or directors for the administration of any public or private educational institution.

Subsection (c)(1)(A) of the statute defines the following Class B misdemeanor, which omits the "intent to go armed" element of (b)(1)'s felony:

It is an offense for any person to possess or carry, whether openly or concealed, any firearm, not used solely for instructional or school-sanctioned ceremonial purposes, in any public or private school building or bus, on any public or private school campus, grounds, recreation area, athletic field or any other property owned, operated, or while in use by any board of education, school, college or university board of trustees, regents or directors for the administration of any public or private educational institution.

The primary objective of statutory construction is to carry out the legislative intent without broadening or restricting the statute beyond its intended scope. State v. Pope, 427 S.W.3d 363, 368 (Tenn. 2013). When the statute is clear, the court will apply the plain meaning of the statute in its normal and accepted use. State v. McNack, 356 S.W.3d 906, 909 (Tenn. 2011); Eastman Chem. Co. v. Johnson, 151 S.W.3d 503, 507 (Tenn. 2004). When the statutory language is silent to the issue at hand, the reviewing court may consider the objective and spirit of the legislation. Id.

  1. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 Would Apply to the Property of a Religious Institution Operated or Used by a School.

Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-17-1309 would apply to possession of weapons, including firearms, on the property of a religious institution that is being operated by, or is in use by, a school, subject to the limitations and exceptions otherwise set forth in the statute. Subsections (b) and (c) state in relevant part that the weapon possession will constitute an offense "on . . . any other property . . . operated, or while in use by any . . . school . . . ." Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(b)(1), (c)(1)(A). Under the plain meaning of this provision, the statute pertains to property being operated or while in use by any school. The statute does not exclude property of religious institutions or any particular type of school, including parochial schools, from its scope. Accordingly, the offenses set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 would apply to the property of a religious institution, as would the limitations and exceptions set forth in the statute.

  1. The Prohibition Against Carrying a Firearm on the Property of a Religious Institution Applies Only to Those Portions of the Property Being Used for School Purposes.

Subsections (b) and (c) of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 would limit the applicability of the statute to conduct occurring on those portions of the property of a religious institution being operated or used by a school. Under the plain meaning of the statute, firearm possession would be prohibited on property "operated, or while in use by any . . . school . . . ." Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(b)(1), (c)(1)(A). That prohibition could cover the entire property or only portions of it, depending upon the nature of the school activity taking place and the configuration of the property. One cannot determine as a categorical matter the place or places in which a person would be prohibited from carrying a weapon on the property; rather, the question must be considered on a case-by-case basis. For example, if a private school were using church grounds to hold a festival encompassing the entire church property, gun possession would be prohibited on the entire grounds. However, if the school were using only a discrete and separate building on church grounds, other portions of the church's property might not fall within the scope of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309. This Office rendered the same opinion in connection with the applicability of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309 to individuals in possession of firearms in parks when schools are only using portions of the parks. See Tenn. Att'y Gen. Op. 09-160, 2009 WL 3157481, at *1-2 (Sept. 8, 2009).

  1. Firearm Possession Would Be Prohibited Only While the Property Is Being Operated or Used by a School.

Under the plain meaning of the statute, firearm possession would be prohibited on the property "operated, or while in use by any . . . school . . . ." Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(b)(1), (c)(1)(A). Therefore, while the property is not being operated or in use by a school, the property would not fall within the scope of the statute. See Tenn. Att'y Gen. Op. 09-160, 2009 WL 3157481, at *2.

Regarding notice of the prohibition, please see the analysis below relating to Question 5.

  1. Home Schooling Appears to Fall Outside the Scope of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309.

Home schooling does not appear to fall within the scope of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309. The offenses set forth in the statute are limited to public or private school property or to "any other property owned, operated, or while in use by any board of education, school, college or university board of trustees, regents or directors for the administration of any public or private educational institution." Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(b)(1), (c)(1)(A). Under its normal and accepted meaning, home schooling is not a school or board of education, much less a college or university board of trustees, regents, or directors for the administration of any public or private educational institutions. Rather, home schooling is normally considered to be an educational alternative to a school. Accordingly, private property being used for home schooling would not fall within the scope of the criminal statute.

  1. Schools are Required to Place Signs About Property Operated or Used by the Schools Giving Notice that Weapons Possession on the Property is a Felony.

School administrators are required to place signs about property being operated or used for school purposes to provide notice that carrying weapons on that property is a felony. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1309(d) (capitals in original) directs as follows:

(1) Each chief administrator of a public or private school shall display in prominent locations about the school a sign, at least six inches (6″) high and fourteen inches (14″) wide, stating:

FELONY. STATE LAW PRESCRIBES A MAXIMUM PENALTY OF SIX (6) YEARS IMPRISONMENT AND A FINE NOT TO EXCEED THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,000) FOR CARRYING WEAPONS ON SCHOOL PROPERTY.

(2) As used in this subsection (d), "prominent locations about a school" includes, but is not limited to, sports arenas, gymnasiums, stadiums and cafeterias.

While property is being operated or used by a school, the property is effectively functioning as part of the school for that time period. Subsection (d) requires that an administrator place signs in prominent locations about the school. The preposition "about" is defined in pertinent part as "in different parts of." Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary 3 (1981). Accordingly, if a school is operating or is using portions of the property of a religious institution for school purposes, the school's administrator is responsible for posting the required signs in different parts of the areas being operated or being used and while the property is being operated or used to give notice of the weapons prohibition.

HERBERT H. SLATERY III
Attorney General and Reporter

ANDRÉE SOPHIA BLUMSTEIN
Solicitor General

ANDREW C. COULAM
Assistant Attorney General

Requested by:
The Honorable Mae Beavers
State Senator
6 Legislative Plaza
Nashville, TN 37243