If a Connecticut superintendent gets a state waiver instead of a teaching certificate, can they earn pension credit in the Teachers' Retirement System?

Short answer No. A superintendent who held only a § 10-157(c) certification waiver letter, not a State Board of Education certificate or permit, did not meet the statutory definition of 'teacher' or 'member' and therefore could not earn pension credit in the Teachers' Retirement System.
State
Connecticut
Opinion
Formal Opinion 2011-01
Issued
May 16, 2011
Issued by
Office of the Connecticut Attorney General
Requested by
Ms. Darlene Perez, State Teachers' Retirement Board

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2011. Ask about yours and see what current Connecticut law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Connecticut Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Connecticut attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Connecticut Attorney General concluded that a school superintendent who served under a state-issued waiver of certification, rather than holding an actual teaching certificate, was not eligible for pension credit in the State Teachers' Retirement System.

The State Teachers' Retirement Board had asked whether superintendents operating under a waiver granted by the Commissioner of Education under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-157(c) qualified as "members" of the retirement system. The AG examined the definitions of "member" and "teacher" in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b and concluded that both definitions required the individual to hold "a certificate or permit issued by the State Board of Education." A waiver letter from the Commissioner of Education was not the same as a certificate or permit, and the legislature had not amended the retirement statutes when it created the waiver process in 2007.

The opinion also noted that if contributions had already been collected from an ineligible superintendent, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183ff(c) required the Retirement Board to refund those contributions and void the related service records.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2011. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Background and statutory framework

Two intersecting statutory schemes drove the analysis. Chapter 167a governed the Teachers' Retirement System. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b(18) defined a "member" as "any Connecticut teacher employed for an average of at least one-half of each school day." Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b(26) defined a "teacher" as a "teacher, permanent substitute teacher, principal, assistant principal, supervisor, assistant superintendent or superintendent employed by the public schools in a professional capacity while possessing a certificate or permit issued by the State Board of Education."

Chapter 166 governed teacher and administrator certification. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-145(a) required that no superintendent be employed unless he or she possessed an appropriate state certificate, except as provided in § 10-157. Before 2007, § 10-157(a) required written confirmation of proper certification from the Commissioner of Education before a superintendent could assume duties.

In 2007, Public Act 07-241, § 4 amended § 10-157 to let the State Board of Education waive the certification requirement for a superintendent who either had at least three years of out-of-state superintendent experience under another state's certificate or whom the Commissioner deemed "exceptionally qualified." When the Commissioner granted such a waiver under § 10-157(c), the State Board of Education did not issue a certificate or permit; the Commissioner instead issued a letter stating that the certification requirement was waived for that individual.

The AG concluded that the 2007 amendments to Chapter 166 had not been mirrored by any change to Chapter 167a's definitions. A waiver letter was not a "certificate or permit issued by the State Board of Education." There was no statutory authority to treat the waiver letter as equivalent to a certificate. So a waiver-holding superintendent did not satisfy the definition of "teacher" and therefore was not a "member" eligible for pension credit.

Common questions

Q: At the time, could a superintendent without a certificate still work in a Connecticut school? A: Yes. The 2007 amendments to § 10-157(c) let the State Board of Education waive certification for qualifying candidates. Such a superintendent could be employed and earn a salary; the only thing the waiver did not do was create eligibility for teacher pension credit.

Q: What happened if the Retirement Board had been collecting pension contributions from such a superintendent? A: The opinion pointed to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183ff(c), which provided that upon a Board determination that a person had been erroneously included in membership, contributions and interest credited under Chapter 167a "shall be refunded and records of related service voided."

Q: Did the AG say the legislature could fix this?
A: Yes. The AG noted that the legislature was free to amend the retirement statutes to extend benefits to waiver-holding superintendents if it wanted to. The opinion turned on the absence of such an amendment, not on a constitutional bar.

Q: Did this opinion apply to acting superintendents under § 10-157(b)? A: A footnote says § 10-157(b) allowed a board to appoint an acting superintendent, "who is or is not properly certified," for up to 90 days. The opinion's pension-credit conclusion concerns superintendents who received a waiver under § 10-157(c); it does not decide eligibility based on an acting appointment alone.

Citations

Statutes: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b (definitions in Teachers' Retirement System); § 10-183b(18) ("member"); § 10-183b(26) ("teacher"); § 10-157(a), (b), (c) (superintendent certification and waiver); § 10-145(a) (certification required for school employment); § 10-183ff(c) (refund of erroneously credited contributions); Public Act 07-241, § 4 (2007 amendment creating waiver process).

Source

Original opinion text

55 Elm Street
GEORGE JEPSEN
P.O. Box 120
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hartford, CT 06141-0120

Office of the Attorney General
State of Connecticut

May 16, 2011

Ms. Darlene Perez
State Teachers’ Retirement Board
765 Asylum Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106

Dear Ms. Perez:

You have inquired of our office whether a superintendent who received a waiver of certification pursuant to Chapter 166 of our general statutes is eligible for pension credit under Chapter 167a, the Teachers’ Retirement System (“System”).

To answer this question, it is necessary to examine the definitions of “member” as contained in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b, and “teacher” as contained in Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-183b(26). We can then proceed to analyze those definitions in light of the certification requirements of Conn. Gen. Stat. §10- 157(c). 1

For purposes of describing who may receive benefits from the System, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b(18) defines a “member” in relevant part as “any Connecticut teacher employed for an average of at least one-half of each school day . . . .” (emphasis added). In turn, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b(26) requires that to be a Connecticut “teacher” for purposes of the System, one must be “any teacher, permanent substitute teacher, principal, assistant principal, supervisor, assistant superintendent or superintendent employed by the public schools in a professional capacity while possessing a certificate or permit issued by the State Board of Education . . . .” (emphasis added). Therefore, for a superintendent to be a “member” who is eligible for pension credit under the System, he or she must possess a “certificate or permit issued by the State Board of Education.” Id.

Prior to 2007, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-157(a) provided:

1
Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-157(c) provides in relevant part that “[t]he commissioner may, upon request of an employing local or regional board of education, grant a waiver of certification . . . .” Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-145(a) further provides in relevant part that “[n]o . . . superintendent, except as provided for in section 10-157, shall be employed in any of the schools of any local regional board of education unless such person possesses an appropriate state certificate . . . .”

Ms. Darlene Perez
Page 2

Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, 2 no person shall assume the duties and responsibilities of the superintendent until the board [of education electing that person] receives written confirmation from the Commissioner of Education that the person to be employed is properly certified.
The commissioner shall inform any such board, in writing, of the proper certification or lack thereof of any such person within fourteen days after the name of such person is submitted to him pursuant to section 10-226.

In 2007, the Legislature amended the statute to permit the State Board of Education (“SBE”) to waive the requirement that a superintendent be “properly certified.” Specifically, Public Act 07-241, § 4 amended Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10- 157(a) to provide that “no person shall assume the duties and responsibilities of the superintendent until the board receives written confirmation from the Commissioner of Education that the person to be employed is properly certified or has had such certification waived by the commissioner pursuant to subsection (c) of this section.” (emphasis denotes new language).

Subsection (c) of Public Act 07-241, § 4, as amended and now codified at Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-157(c), provided:

The commissioner may, upon request of an employing local or regional board of education, grant a waiver of certification to a person (1) who has successfully completed at least three years of experience as a certified administrator with a superintendent certificate issued by another state in a public school in another state during the ten-year period prior to the date of application, or (2) who the commissioner deems to be exceptionally qualified for the position of superintendent. In order for the commissioner to find a person exceptionally qualified, such person shall (A) be an acting superintendent pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, (B) have worked as a superintendent in 2
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-157(b) provides authority for a board to appoint an “acting” superintendent, either one “who is or is not properly certified,” for not longer than 90 days.

Ms. Darlene Perez
Page 3

another state for no fewer than fifteen years, and (C) be certified or have been certified as a superintendent by such other state.

Thus, under current Connecticut law, a person may be eligible for election as a superintendent in one of two ways: obtain proper certification from the SBE, or upon the request of the employing local or regional board obtain a waiver of certification from the SBE.

However, in amending Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-157 to permit the SBE to waive the certification requirement, the Legislature did not amend the definition of those eligible to obtain a pension as a “member” of the State Teachers’ Retirement System. Thus, the recipient of the § 10-157(c) waiver is not a “teacher” for purposes of the System because he only possesses a letter from the Commissioner of Education and not “a certificate or permit issued by” the SBE. 3 Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-183b(26) (emphasis added). In turn, an individual’s failure to meet the statutory requirement of “teacher” for purposes of the System compels a conclusion that he is not a “member” because he is not “any Connecticut teacher.” Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183b(18) (emphasis added). Furthermore, there is no statutory authority to waive the “certificate or permit” requirement for a “teacher,” or to provide that a “letter” from the Commissioner is the equivalent of either a “certificate or permit.” See §§ 10-183b, et seq.

Thus, we conclude based on current law, that, a superintendent who received a waiver of certification pursuant to Chapter 166 of our general statutes is not eligible for pension credit for such service as a superintendent under Chapter 167a based on that individual’s failure to qualify statutorily as a “teacher” and “member” for purposes of the System. Of course, the Legislature is free to amend the statutes governing the Teachers’ Retirement System if it is of the view that benefits should be extended to those who receive a waiver. To the extent that any employer or the Teachers Retirement Board itself has been treating this individual as eligible for a pension by collecting contributions, Connecticut statutes anticipate this scenario. Specifically, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-183ff(c) provides in relevant part that “[u]pon determination by the . . . Board that any

3
We have been informed that when the Commissioner waives the certificate requirement pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-157(c), the SBE does not issue a “certificate or permit.” See Conn. Gen. Stat. §10-183b(26). Rather, the Commissioner merely provides a “letter” indicating that the requirement to hold a certificate is waived with respect to the individual. This process clearly permits the individual under Chapter 166 of the Connecticut General Statutes to “be employed in any of the schools of any local or regional board of education,” and to “be entitled to any salary” in the absence of state issued certification. See Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-145(a).

Ms. Darlene Perez
Page 4

person has erroneously been included in membership in the teachers’ retirement system, contributions and interest credited under the provisions of this chapter shall be refunded and records of related service voided.” (emphasis added).

Very truly yours,

GEORGE JEPSEN
ATTORNEY GENERAL

What does Connecticut law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2011. Ezel checks the current Connecticut statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace