OBJECTION TO INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION (IME)
(Workers' Compensation Medical Evaluation Dispute)
PART 1: CASE INFORMATION
DATE OF OBJECTION: [DATE]
CLAIM NUMBER: [NUMBER]
WCAB/BOARD CASE NUMBER: [NUMBER]
DATE OF INJURY: [DATE]
PART 2: PARTIES
2.1 Injured Worker (Objecting Party)
Name: [FULL NAME]
Address:
[STREET ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE]
Phone: [PHONE NUMBER]
Email: [EMAIL]
2.2 Injured Worker's Attorney
Name: [ATTORNEY NAME]
Firm: [FIRM NAME]
Bar Number: [NUMBER]
Address:
[STREET ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE]
Phone: [PHONE]
Fax: [FAX]
Email: [EMAIL]
2.3 Insurance Carrier/Employer
Carrier/Employer Name: [NAME]
Claims Examiner: [NAME]
Address:
[STREET ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE]
Phone: [PHONE]
2.4 Defense Attorney
Name: [NAME]
Firm: [FIRM]
Address: [ADDRESS]
Phone: [PHONE]
PART 3: IME NOTICE INFORMATION
3.1 IME Appointment Details
Date of IME Notice: [DATE]
Scheduled IME Date: [DATE]
Scheduled IME Time: [TIME]
Scheduled IME Location:
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE]
Distance from Injured Worker's Residence: [MILES]
3.2 Designated Examiner
IME Physician Name: [NAME], [CREDENTIALS]
Specialty: [SPECIALTY]
Medical License Number: [NUMBER]
Practice/Facility Name: [NAME]
Address: [ADDRESS]
Phone: [PHONE]
PART 4: GROUNDS FOR OBJECTION
4.1 Objection Categories
Injured Worker objects to the scheduled IME on the following grounds:
☐ IMPROPER NOTICE
- Notice was not timely (less than [STATE REQUIREMENT] days)
- Notice was incomplete or deficient
- Notice sent to wrong address
Details:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ EXAMINER BIAS OR CONFLICT OF INTEREST
- Examiner has previously evaluated this claimant adversely
- Examiner is known for consistently defense-favorable opinions
- Examiner has financial relationship with carrier
- Examiner's practice primarily consists of IME work for insurance carriers
Details:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ INAPPROPRIATE SPECIALTY
- Examiner's specialty does not match the body parts/conditions at issue
- Claimed body parts: [LIST]
- Examiner's specialty: [SPECIALTY]
- Appropriate specialty would be: [SPECIALTY]
Details:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ EXCESSIVE DISTANCE
- IME location is unreasonably far from injured worker's residence
- Distance: [MILES]
- Reasonable distance in this state: [MILES]
- Transportation difficulties: [EXPLAIN]
Details:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ SCHEDULING CONFLICT
- Injured worker has work obligations: [EXPLAIN]
- Injured worker has medical appointments: [DATE/PROVIDER]
- Injured worker has childcare/family obligations: [EXPLAIN]
- Other unavoidable conflict: [EXPLAIN]
Alternative dates proposed:
1. [DATE AND TIME]
2. [DATE AND TIME]
3. [DATE AND TIME]
☐ DUPLICATIVE OR UNNECESSARY EXAMINATION
- Recent QME/AME evaluation was performed: [DATE]
- Recent PTP evaluation addresses same issues: [DATE]
- No new medical issue justifies additional examination
Details:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ SCOPE OF EXAMINATION
- Requested examination exceeds scope of legitimate inquiry
- Examination includes body parts not claimed
- Examination includes inappropriate procedures
Objectionable scope:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ PROCEDURAL DEFECTS
- IME was not properly requested under state procedures
- Required state process was not followed (e.g., QME process bypassed)
- Other procedural violation: [EXPLAIN]
Details:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ MEDICAL CONDITION PRECLUDES ATTENDANCE
- Injured worker's current condition prevents travel
- Injured worker's condition prevents lengthy examination
- Supporting documentation: [ATTACH]
Details:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ OTHER GROUNDS
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
PART 5: DETAILED OBJECTION STATEMENT
5.1 Statement of Facts
[PROVIDE DETAILED FACTUAL BACKGROUND SUPPORTING THE OBJECTION]
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
5.2 Legal Argument
[CITE APPLICABLE STATUTES, REGULATIONS, AND CASE LAW SUPPORTING THE OBJECTION]
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
PART 6: EXAMINER-SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS
6.1 Objections to Designated Examiner
Examiner: [NAME]
Reasons for Objection to This Examiner:
☐ Prior adverse evaluation of this injured worker
Date of prior evaluation: [DATE]
Findings: [SUMMARY]
☐ Known defense bias
Evidence:
____________________________________________________________________________
☐ Lack of appropriate credentials
Required credentials: [SPECIFY]
Examiner lacks: [SPECIFY]
☐ Disciplinary history
[DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS]
☐ Other:
____________________________________________________________________________
6.2 Alternative Examiner Request
If the IME must proceed, injured worker requests:
☐ A different examiner in the same specialty
Suggested examiner(s): [NAME(S)]
☐ An examiner closer to injured worker's residence
☐ An examiner selected through proper state procedures (QME panel, etc.)
☐ Other accommodation: [SPECIFY]
PART 7: REQUESTED RELIEF
7.1 Relief Sought
Injured Worker requests that:
☐ The scheduled IME be cancelled
☐ The IME be rescheduled to: [PROPOSED DATE(S)]
☐ The IME location be changed to within [MILES] of injured worker's residence
☐ A different examiner be designated
☐ The IME be conducted through proper state procedures (QME process)
☐ The scope of the IME be limited to: [SPECIFY]
☐ The injured worker be permitted to have a witness/representative present
☐ The examination be video or audio recorded
☐ Other relief: [SPECIFY]
7.2 Conditions for Attendance
If the IME proceeds, injured worker requests:
☐ Advance provision of all medical records to be reviewed by the examiner
☐ Written confirmation of examination scope and procedures
☐ Reasonable examination duration (not to exceed [TIME])
☐ Rest breaks as needed
☐ Interpreter services (Language: [LANGUAGE])
☐ Transportation assistance
☐ Other: [SPECIFY]
PART 8: STATE-SPECIFIC PROCEDURES
8.1 California
☐ This objection asserts that:
- The carrier is attempting to bypass the QME process
- Represented applicant is entitled to QME/AME evaluation, not carrier-selected IME
- Request for QME panel should be filed instead
☐ For unrepresented applicants:
- Carrier may schedule a single examination with a QME
- Objection to specific QME on panel
8.2 [YOUR STATE]
[INSERT STATE-SPECIFIC IME PROCEDURES AND OBJECTION RIGHTS]
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
PART 9: CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE
9.1 Notice to Insurance Carrier
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
If this objection is overruled or the IME is deemed proper, the injured worker:
☐ Will attend the rescheduled IME at a mutually agreeable time
☐ Reserves all rights to challenge the IME findings
☐ May request a deposition of the IME physician
☐ May present contrary medical evidence
9.2 Notice to Injured Worker
Important: Failure to attend a properly scheduled IME may result in:
- Suspension of benefits
- Adverse inference in proceedings
- Other penalties under state law
PART 10: CERTIFICATION
I, [NAME], declare under penalty of perjury that:
☐ The statements in this objection are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
☐ This objection is made in good faith based on legitimate concerns.
☐ I have served a copy of this objection on all parties as indicated below.
Signature: _________________________________
Printed Name: [NAME]
Title: [ATTORNEY/INJURED WORKER]
Date: [DATE]
PART 11: PROOF OF SERVICE
I declare that on [DATE], I served a true copy of this Objection to IME on:
| Party | Name | Address | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance Carrier | [NAME] | [ADDRESS] | ☐ Fax ☐ Email ☐ Mail |
| Defense Attorney | [NAME] | [ADDRESS] | ☐ Fax ☐ Email ☐ Mail |
| IME Physician | [NAME] | [ADDRESS] | ☐ Fax ☐ Email ☐ Mail |
| WCAB (if applicable) | [OFFICE] | [ADDRESS] | ☐ Fax ☐ Email ☐ Mail |
Method of Service:
☐ Fax - Fax Number: [NUMBER], Date/Time: [DATE/TIME]
☐ Email - Email Address: [EMAIL], Date/Time: [DATE/TIME]
☐ First Class Mail - Date Mailed: [DATE]
☐ Personal Service - Date/Time: [DATE/TIME]
Signature: _________________________________
Printed Name: [NAME]
Date: [DATE]
PART 12: RESPONSE DEADLINE
Response to this objection is requested by: [DATE - typically 5-10 days]
If no response is received, injured worker will:
☐ File a motion/petition with the Workers' Compensation Board
☐ Not attend the scheduled IME pending resolution
☐ Other: [SPECIFY]
PART 13: ATTACHMENTS
☐ Copy of IME notice
☐ Map showing distance from residence to IME location
☐ Documentation of scheduling conflict
☐ Medical documentation supporting inability to attend
☐ Evidence of examiner bias
☐ Prior evaluation reports from this examiner
☐ State regulations regarding IME requirements
☐ Other: [SPECIFY]
[END OF DOCUMENT]
About This Template
Jurisdiction-Specific
This template is drafted for general use across all U.S. jurisdictions. State-specific versions with local statutory references are also available.
How It's Made
Drafted using current statutory databases and legal standards for employment hr. Each template includes proper legal citations, defined terms, and standard protective clauses.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: February 2026