Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint - Ohio

Ohio Personal Injury Updated November 1, 2026 Free Word and PDF

UNINSURED / UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COMPLAINT

Table of Contents

  1. Caption
  2. Parties
  3. Jurisdiction and Venue
  4. General Allegations
  5. Policy Identification and Coverage
  6. UM vs. UIM Status
  7. First Claim for Relief — Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)
  8. Second Claim for Relief — Bad Faith
  9. Damages
  10. Jury Demand
  11. Prayer for Relief

Caption

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

[COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, OHIO

[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], [PLAINTIFF STREET ADDRESS], [CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE], Case No.: [________________________________]
Plaintiff,
v. COMPLAINT
[INSURANCE COMPANY NAME], [INSURER STREET ADDRESS], [CITY], [STATE] [ZIP CODE], (Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist)
Defendant. Judge: [________________________________]

Parties

  1. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] ("Plaintiff"), is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Ohio, and is an insured under the automobile insurance policy described herein.

  2. Defendant, [INSURANCE COMPANY NAME] ("Defendant Insurer"), is an insurance company authorized to transact business in the State of Ohio, with its principal place of business at [INSURER ADDRESS].

  3. [JOHN/JANE DOE] ("Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist") is an individual who, at all relevant times, operated a motor vehicle [☐ without liability insurance / ☐ with liability insurance inadequate to compensate Plaintiff's damages].


Jurisdiction and Venue

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.01 and the Ohio Constitution, Art. IV, § 4.

  2. The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum of this Court.

5A. For purposes of Ohio Civ.R. 8(A), Plaintiff [seeks more than $25,000 / does not seek more than $25,000] in monetary relief.

  1. Venue is proper in [COUNTY] County under Ohio Civ.R. 3(C) because [☐ Defendant has its principal place of business here / ☐ all or part of the claim for relief arose here / ☐ this is an action described in Civ.R. 4.3 and Plaintiff resides here]. Select only a basis supported by the facts.

General Allegations

  1. On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was [☐ operating / ☐ a passenger in] a motor vehicle on [STREET/HIGHWAY/ROUTE], in [CITY/VILLAGE/TOWNSHIP], [COUNTY] County, Ohio.

  2. At said time and place, the Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist negligently operated a motor vehicle, proximately causing a collision with Plaintiff's vehicle.

  3. The Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist was negligent in one or more of the following respects:

☐ Operating a vehicle at an excessive or unreasonable speed
☐ Failure to yield the right of way (ORC § 4511.43)
☐ Failure to maintain an assured clear distance ahead (ORC § 4511.21)
☐ Following too closely (ORC § 4511.34)
☐ Operating under the influence (ORC § 4511.19)
☐ Failure to obey a traffic control device (ORC § 4511.12)
☐ Improper lane change
☐ Distracted driving / texting while driving (ORC § 4511.204)
☐ Other: [________________________________]

  1. As a direct and proximate result of the above-described negligence, Plaintiff sustained serious bodily injuries and damages.

Policy Identification and Coverage

  1. At the time of the accident, Plaintiff was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Defendant Insurer, Policy No. [POLICY NUMBER], effective from [POLICY START DATE] to [POLICY END DATE] (the "Policy").

  2. The Policy includes uninsured motorist ("UM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident.

  3. The Policy includes underinsured motorist ("UIM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UIM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UIM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident.

  4. Plaintiff has paid all premiums due under the Policy and has complied with all conditions precedent.

  5. UM/UIM coverage under Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.18 is optional and not required by law; however, Defendant Insurer offered and Plaintiff affirmatively selected such coverage under the Policy, as reflected in the declarations and/or selection documents referenced herein. [☐ Plaintiff did not execute any valid written rejection of the UM/UIM coverage selected under the Policy.]


UM vs. UIM Status

Select one:

☐ Uninsured Motorist (UM) Claim:

  1. The at-fault motorist was uninsured at the time of the accident in that [☐ no bodily injury liability policy was in effect / ☐ the at-fault motorist is unknown (hit-and-run) / ☐ the at-fault motorist's insurer denied coverage or is insolvent].

☐ Underinsured Motorist (UIM) Claim:

  1. The at-fault motorist maintained bodily injury liability coverage with limits of $[TORTFEASOR POLICY LIMIT], which is less than Plaintiff's UIM coverage limits.

  2. Plaintiff has exhausted the at-fault motorist's bodily injury liability limits and received $[AMOUNT RECOVERED FROM TORTFEASOR] in [☐ settlement / ☐ judgment].

  3. Defendant Insurer was provided with timely written notice and the opportunity to consent to the settlement with the tortfeasor's insurer.

  4. Under Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.18(C), UIM coverage provides protection not greater than the amount that would be available under the insured's UM coverage if the tortfeasor were uninsured. The UIM policy limits are reduced by amounts available from all applicable bodily injury liability policies covering the tortfeasor.


First Claim for Relief

Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)

  1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 20.

  2. The Policy constitutes a valid and enforceable contract between Plaintiff and Defendant Insurer.

  3. Plaintiff has performed all obligations and satisfied all conditions precedent required under the Policy.

  4. Defendant Insurer has breached the Policy by failing and refusing to pay UM/UIM benefits owed to Plaintiff despite proper and timely demand.

  5. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Insurer's breach, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.


Second Claim for Relief

Bad Faith

  1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 25.

  2. Under Ohio law, an insurer has a duty to act in good faith in the handling and payment of claims presented by its insureds. Zoppo v. Homestead Ins. Co., 71 Ohio St.3d 552 (1994).

  3. Defendant Insurer acted in bad faith by:

☐ Unreasonably delaying investigation and/or processing of the claim
☐ Denying benefits without a reasonable justification
☐ Failing to make a good-faith effort to settle the claim
☐ Refusing to pay an amount clearly owed while disputing only the excess
☐ Other: [________________________________]

  1. Defendant Insurer's conduct lacked reasonable justification and caused Plaintiff compensatory damages distinct from unpaid policy benefits. [If supported by specific facts, describe conduct showing actual malice, fraud, or insult: FACTS.] Punitive damages on the bad-faith claim require that additional showing; bad faith alone does not establish entitlement to them. Buckeye Union Ins. Co. v. New England Ins. Co., 1999-Ohio-67, ¶¶ 31–32, 38.

Damages

  1. As a result of the accident and Defendant Insurer's breaches, Plaintiff has suffered the following damages:

☐ Past medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Past lost wages/earnings: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future lost wages/earning capacity: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Pain and suffering (past and future): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Mental anguish and emotional distress: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Physical disability and disfigurement: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Loss of enjoyment of life: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Punitive damages (bad faith claim, only if actual malice, fraud, or insult is proved): According to proof
☐ Prejudgment interest (ORC § 1343.03)
☐ Attorney's fees (if applicable)
☐ Costs of suit


Jury Demand

Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.


Prayer for Relief

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant Insurer as follows:

  1. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
  2. UM/UIM benefits in the full amount owed under the Policy;
  3. Punitive damages on the bad-faith claim, if the pleaded facts and proof establish actual malice, fraud, or insult;
  4. Prejudgment interest pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code § 1343.03;
  5. Attorney's fees and costs as permitted by law;
  6. Costs of this action; and
  7. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and equitable.

Respectfully submitted,

[ATTORNEY NAME], Ohio Supreme Court Reg. No. [REG NUMBER]
[FIRM NAME]
[FIRM ADDRESS]
[CITY], Ohio [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff


State-Specific Notes — Ohio

Topic Detail
UM/UIM Mandatory? Ohio's S.B. 97, effective October 31, 2001, revised the UM/UIM coverage law. Under the current rule described by the Ohio Legislative Service Commission, insurers may, but need not, include UM/UIM coverage (§ 3937.18(A)); check the policy for the coverage actually purchased
Default if Not Rejected No statutory default-election rule currently in ORC 3937.18/.181; coverage terms (including any offer/selection/rejection procedure) are governed by the policy itself
UIM Calculation NOT excess — provides "gap" coverage; limits reduced by tortfeasor's available coverage (§ 3937.18(C))
Stacking Review the policy and current ORC § 3937.18 for any applicable stacking restriction before calculating coverage.
Workers' Comp Setoff NOT allowed — UM/UIM cannot be reduced by workers' comp benefits (§ 3937.18(E))
Arbitration Not statutorily mandated by ORC § 2711.01 (Ohio's general arbitration act) or any UM/UIM-specific statute; arbitration applies only if the policy itself contains an arbitration clause, which is then enforced under § 2711.01. Absent a policy arbitration clause, UM/UIM disputes proceed as ordinary civil litigation
Bad Faith Common-law first-party tort recognized — Zoppo v. Homestead Ins. Co., 71 Ohio St.3d 552 (1994) ("reasonable justification" standard); properly pled as a separate claim alongside (not in lieu of) the breach-of-contract claim; analyze its limitations period separately from the policy's UM/UIM suit limitation
Exhaustion (UIM) Must exhaust tortfeasor's limits; insurer entitled to consent to settlement
Statute of Limitations Section 2305.06 supplies a general written-contract period, but a UM/UIM policy may impose a shorter contractual claim or suit deadline under § 3937.18(H). Read the policy's limitation and trigger before pleading timeliness; Barbee v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010-Ohio-2016, ¶ 29 (a three-year policy period may be reasonable, subject to the policy's wording)
Hit-and-Run Physical contact is not required for an unidentified-vehicle UM claim. The current corroboration rule is in ORC § 3937.18(B)(1)(c), which the legislature enacted after Girgis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 75 Ohio St.3d 302 (1996). The insured's testimony alone is insufficient, but evidence derived from that testimony may satisfy the rule when supported by additional evidence. Smith v. Erie Ins. Co., 148 Ohio St.3d 192, 2016-Ohio-7742

Sources and References

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)Choose a plan

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
uninsured_motorist_complaint_oh.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Draft it in the editor

The AI drafts each section from your answers and you review every word. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours for $99 one time.

  • Built on this template
    Uses the Ohio version and the statutes it cites.
  • Formatted like the template
    Captions, numbering and layout stay intact.
  • AI editing
    Rewrite any section from your own notes.
  • Export as PDF and Word
    Yours to review, sign, or file.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About this template

Last updated
November 1, 2026
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Category
Personal Injury

Legal authority

  • Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.18 (UM/UIM coverage; check current law and policy terms for stacking restrictions)
  • Ohio Rev. Code § 3937.181 (Uninsured Motorist Property Damage Coverage — NOT an offer/rejection statute; governs mandatory availability of UM property-damage coverage up to $7,500)
  • Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.06 (general six-year period for written contracts, subject to a valid UM/UIM policy limitation under § 3937.18(H))
  • Ohio Rev. Code § 2711.01 (General Arbitration Act — governs enforceability of an arbitration clause only if the UM/UIM policy itself contains one; Ohio does not statutorily mandate arbitration of UM/UIM disputes)

Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Checked against the law it cites

The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.

Ohio Civ.R. 3(C)(2), (6), (7) (checked October 26, 2026): "(2) The county in which the defendant has his or her principal place of business ... (6) The county in which all or part of the claim for relief arose ... (7) In actions described in Civ.R. 4.3, in the county where plaintiff resides"

Ohio Civ.R. 8(A), Rules of Civil Procedure effective July 1, 2026 (checked October 28, 2026): "If the party seeks more than twenty-five thousand dollars, the party shall so state in the pleading"

Ohio Civ.R. 10(A) (checked October 31, 2026): "In the complaint the title of the action shall include the names and addresses of all the parties"

Smith v. Erie Ins. Co., 148 Ohio St.3d 192, 2016-Ohio-7742, ¶ 17 (checked October 24, 2026): "Notably, R.C. 3937.18(B) does not track Girgis; rather, the statute requires independent corroborative evidence but states that the insured’s own testimony supported by additional evidence can constitute independent corroborative evidence."

Draft your Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint in the editor

Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.