Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint - New Mexico

New Mexico Personal Injury Updated September 12, 2026 Free Word and PDF

UNINSURED / UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COMPLAINT

Table of Contents

  1. Caption
  2. Parties
  3. Jurisdiction and Venue
  4. General Allegations
  5. Policy Identification and Coverage
  6. Stacking Provisions
  7. UM vs. UIM Status
  8. First Claim — Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)
  9. Second Claim — Unfair Claims Practices (NMSA § 59A-16-20)
  10. Third Claim — Common-Law Bad Faith
  11. Damages
  12. Jury Demand
  13. Prayer for Relief

Caption

STATE OF NEW MEXICO
COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]
[JUDICIAL DISTRICT] JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME],
Plaintiff,
v. No.: [________________________________]
[INSURANCE COMPANY NAME],
Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
(Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist)

Parties

  1. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] ("Plaintiff"), is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, New Mexico [ZIP CODE], and is an insured under the automobile insurance policy described herein.

  2. Defendant, [INSURANCE COMPANY NAME] ("Defendant Insurer"), is an insurance company authorized to transact business in the State of New Mexico, with its principal place of business at [INSURER ADDRESS].

  3. [JOHN/JANE DOE] ("Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist") is an individual who, at all relevant times, operated a motor vehicle [☐ without liability insurance / ☐ with liability insurance inadequate to compensate Plaintiff's damages].


Jurisdiction and Venue

  1. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to N.M. Const. art. VI, § 13.

  2. Venue is proper in [COUNTY] County under NMSA 1978 § 38-3-1 [SELECT SUBSECTION] because [Plaintiff or Defendant resides in this County / the contract sued on was made or is to be performed in this County / the cause of action originated or indebtedness was incurred in this County / another selected statutory ground applies]. Apply subsection (F)'s specific alternatives to a qualifying foreign-corporation Defendant.

  3. The amount in controversy exceeds $[AMOUNT].


General Allegations

  1. On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was [☐ operating / ☐ a passenger in] a motor vehicle on [STREET/HIGHWAY/ROUTE], in or near [CITY], [COUNTY] County, New Mexico.

  2. At said time and place, the Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist negligently operated a motor vehicle, proximately causing a collision with Plaintiff's vehicle.

  3. The Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist was negligent in one or more of the following respects:

☐ Operating at an excessive or unreasonable speed (NMSA § 66-7-301)
☐ Failure to yield the right of way (NMSA § 66-7-328)
☐ Following too closely (NMSA § 66-7-318)
☐ Driving under the influence (NMSA § 66-8-102)
☐ Failure to obey a traffic control device (NMSA § 66-7-105)
☐ Improper lane change (NMSA § 66-7-317)
☐ Texting while driving (NMSA § 66-7-374)
☐ Other: [________________________________]

  1. As a direct and proximate result of the above-described negligence, Plaintiff sustained serious bodily injuries and damages.

Policy Identification and Coverage

  1. At the time of the accident, Plaintiff was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Defendant Insurer, Policy No. [POLICY NUMBER], effective from [POLICY START DATE] to [POLICY END DATE] (the "Policy").

  2. The Policy includes uninsured motorist ("UM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident.

  3. The Policy includes underinsured motorist ("UIM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UIM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UIM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident.

  4. Plaintiff has paid all premiums due under the Policy and has complied with all conditions precedent.

  5. Plaintiff [☐ accepted UM/UIM coverage / ☐ did not execute a valid written rejection of UM/UIM coverage].


Stacking Provisions

  1. ☐ Plaintiff claims stacking of UM/UIM coverages.

☐ Plaintiff is covered under multiple policies and claims stacking of coverages totaling $[AMOUNT]
☐ Policy lacks a plain and affirmative anti-stacking declaration
☐ Stacking is not at issue in this claim


UM vs. UIM Status

Select one:

☐ Uninsured Motorist (UM) Claim:

  1. The at-fault motorist was uninsured at the time of the accident in that [☐ no bodily injury liability policy was in effect / ☐ the at-fault motorist is unknown (hit-and-run) / ☐ the at-fault motorist's insurer denied coverage or is insolvent].

☐ Underinsured Motorist (UIM) Claim:

  1. The at-fault motorist maintained bodily injury liability coverage with limits of $[TORTFEASOR POLICY LIMIT], which is less than the limits of liability under Plaintiff's UM/UIM coverage.

  2. Plaintiff has exhausted the at-fault motorist's bodily injury liability limits and received $[AMOUNT RECOVERED FROM TORTFEASOR] in [☐ settlement / ☐ judgment].

  3. Defendant Insurer was provided with timely written notice and the opportunity to consent to the settlement with the tortfeasor's insurer.


First Claim

Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)

  1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 20.

  2. The Policy constitutes a valid and enforceable contract between Plaintiff and Defendant Insurer.

  3. Plaintiff has performed all obligations and satisfied all conditions precedent required under the Policy.

  4. Defendant Insurer has breached the Policy by failing and refusing to pay UM/UIM benefits owed to Plaintiff despite proper and timely demand.

  5. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Insurer's breach, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.


Second Claim

Unfair Claims Practices (NMSA 1978 § 59A-16-20)

  1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 25.

  2. NMSA 1978 § 59A-16-30 permits a covered person damaged by an Article 16 violation to bring an action in district court. A listed § 59A-16-20 practice must be knowingly committed or performed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice.

  3. Defendant Insurer violated the Unfair Claims Practices Act by engaging in one or more of the following acts:

☐ Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions
☐ Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims
☐ Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims
☐ Failing to affirm or deny coverage within a reasonable time after completed proof-of-loss requirements were submitted
☐ Failing to attempt in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair settlements
☐ Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due
☐ Other: [________________________________]

  1. Plaintiff has been damaged by Defendant Insurer's unfair claims practices and is entitled to damages as provided by law.

Third Claim

Common-Law Bad Faith

  1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 29.

  2. Under New Mexico common law, an insurer owes its insured a duty of good faith and fair dealing implied in the insurance contract.

  3. Defendant Insurer breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing by acting unreasonably and without proper cause in handling Plaintiff's claim.

  4. Defendant Insurer's conduct was willful, wanton, fraudulent, or in reckless disregard of Plaintiff's rights, entitling Plaintiff to compensatory and punitive damages.


Damages

  1. As a result of the accident and Defendant Insurer's breaches, Plaintiff has suffered the following damages:

☐ Past medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Past lost wages/earnings: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future lost wages/earning capacity: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Pain and suffering (past and future): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Mental anguish and emotional distress: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Physical disability and disfigurement: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Loss of enjoyment of life: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Damages for unfair claims practices (§ 59A-16-20)
☐ Compensatory damages for common-law bad faith
☐ Punitive damages
☐ Prejudgment interest (NMSA § 56-8-4)
☐ Attorney's fees (if authorized)
☐ Costs of suit


Jury Demand

Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.


Prayer for Relief

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant Insurer as follows:

  1. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
  2. UM/UIM benefits in the full amount owed under the Policy;
  3. Damages for violation of the Unfair Claims Practices Act (NMSA § 59A-16-20);
  4. Compensatory and punitive damages for common-law bad faith;
  5. Prejudgment interest pursuant to NMSA § 56-8-4;
  6. Costs of this action; and
  7. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and equitable.

Respectfully submitted,

[ATTORNEY NAME], New Mexico Bar No. [BAR NUMBER]
[FIRM NAME]
[FIRM ADDRESS]
[CITY], New Mexico [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff


State-Specific Notes — New Mexico

Topic Detail
UM Offer Required? Coverage must be offered with covered auto policies; named insured may reject (§ 66-5-301)
UIM Included? UIM is included within offered UM coverage (§ 66-5-301(B))
Minimum Limits $25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident
UM Property Damage Deductible not exceeding $250 (§ 66-5-301(C))
Stacking Fact-specific; review insured class, premiums, policies, offer/rejection documents, and Schmick, Ullman, and Kileen
Liberal Construction UM Act is liberally construed in favor of the insured
Unfair Claims Act Listed practices in § 59A-16-20; private action under § 59A-16-30
Common-Law Bad Faith Recognized — implied covenant of good faith; punitive damages available
Arbitration Per policy terms; offsets from arbitration awards per case law
SOL — Contract 6 years (NMSA § 37-1-3)
SOL — Personal Injury 3 years (NMSA § 37-1-8)
Hit-and-Run Covered under UM; check policy for physical contact / notice requirements
Rejection on Renewal Once rejected, coverage not required on renewal unless requested in writing

Sources and References

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)Choose a plan

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
uninsured_motorist_complaint_nm.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Draft it in the editor

The AI drafts each section from your answers and you review every word. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours for $99 one time.

  • Built on this template
    Uses the New Mexico version and the statutes it cites.
  • Formatted like the template
    Captions, numbering and layout stay intact.
  • AI editing
    Rewrite any section from your own notes.
  • Export as PDF and Word
    Yours to review, sign, or file.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About this template

Last updated
September 12, 2026
Jurisdiction
New Mexico
Category
Personal Injury

Legal authority

  • NMSA 1978 § 66-5-301 (Insurance Against Uninsured and Unknown Motorists)
  • NMSA 1978 § 66-5-301(B) (Underinsured Motorist Coverage)
  • NMSA 1978 §§ 59A-16-20, 59A-16-30 (Unfair Claims Practices; Private Action)
  • NMSA 1978 § 37-1-3 (Six-Year Statute of Limitations — Written Contracts)
  • NMSA 1978 § 38-3-1 (claim- and defendant-specific district-court venue)

Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Checked against the law it cites

The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.

NMSA 1978, § 38-3-1(A) (checked September 12, 2026): "First, except as provided in Subsection F of this section relating to foreign corporations, all transitory actions shall be brought in the county where either the plaintiff or defendant, or any one of them in case there is more than one of either, resides; or second, in the county where the contract sued on was made or is to be performed or where the cause of action originated or indebtedness sued on was incurred."

Draft your Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint in the editor

Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.